From: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
To: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
"Shreyas B. Prabhu" <shreyasbp@gmail.com>,
Shilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>,
Akshay Adiga <akshay.adiga@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Mahesh J Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] powernv:idle: Decouple TB restore & Per-core SPRs restore
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 16:55:45 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1492066545.4624.52.camel@neuling.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <27511c1235ee58c66eabdea65b39f5dd35d91426.1491996797.git.ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Wed, 2017-04-12 at 17:16 +0530, Gautham R. Shenoy wrote:
> From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>=20
> The idle-exit code assumes that if Timebase is not lost, then neither
> are the per-core hypervisor resources lost.=20
Double negative! How about:
The idle-exit code assumes that if the timebase is restored, then the
per-core hypervisor resources are also restored.
> This was true on POWER8
> where fast-sleep lost only TB but not per-core resources, and winkle
> lost both.
>=20
> This assumption is not true for POWER9 however, since there can be
> states which do not lose timebase but can lose per-core SPRs.
>=20
> Hence check if we need to restore the per-core hypervisor state even
> if timebase is not lost.
I think I understand what you're doing, just seems awkwardly worded.
Is this actually what the patch is doing? It seem to be just changing one
branch.
Mikey
>=20
> Signed-off-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> =C2=A0arch/powerpc/kernel/idle_book3s.S | 7 ++++---
> =C2=A01 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>=20
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/idle_book3s.S
> b/arch/powerpc/kernel/idle_book3s.S
> index 9b747e9..6a9bd28 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/idle_book3s.S
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/idle_book3s.S
> @@ -723,13 +723,14 @@ timebase_resync:
> =C2=A0 =C2=A0* Use cr3 which indicates that we are waking up with atleast=
partial
> =C2=A0 =C2=A0* hypervisor state loss to determine if TIMEBASE RESYNC is n=
eeded.
> =C2=A0 =C2=A0*/
> - ble cr3,clear_lock
> + ble cr3,.Ltb_resynced
> =C2=A0 /* Time base re-sync */
> =C2=A0 bl opal_resync_timebase;
> =C2=A0 /*
> - =C2=A0* If waking up from sleep, per core state is not lost, skip to
> - =C2=A0* clear_lock.
> + =C2=A0* If waking up from sleep (POWER8), per core state
> + =C2=A0* is not lost, skip to clear_lock.
> =C2=A0 =C2=A0*/
> +.Ltb_resynced:
> =C2=A0 blt cr4,clear_lock
> =C2=A0
> =C2=A0 /*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-13 6:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-12 11:46 [PATCH 0/3] powernv:stop: Some fixes for handling deep stop Gautham R. Shenoy
2017-04-12 11:46 ` [PATCH 1/3] powernv:idle: Use correct IDLE_THREAD_BITS in POWER8/9 Gautham R. Shenoy
2017-04-13 6:36 ` Michael Neuling
2017-04-13 10:00 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-04-13 11:35 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2017-04-12 11:46 ` [PATCH 2/3] powernv:idle: Decouple TB restore & Per-core SPRs restore Gautham R. Shenoy
2017-04-13 6:55 ` Michael Neuling [this message]
2017-04-13 11:51 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2017-04-12 11:46 ` [PATCH 3/3] powernv:idle: Set LPCR_UPRT on wakeup from deep-stop Gautham R. Shenoy
2017-04-13 3:58 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2017-04-13 4:12 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2017-04-13 6:27 ` Michael Neuling
2017-04-13 7:18 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-04-13 10:05 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-04-13 11:54 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2017-04-13 12:08 ` Nicholas Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1492066545.4624.52.camel@neuling.org \
--to=mikey@neuling.org \
--cc=akshay.adiga@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
--cc=ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=shreyasbp@gmail.com \
--cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).