From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/powernv: Fix opal entry/exit MSR_RI coverage
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 15:09:02 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1493010542.25766.201.camel@kernel.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170424145500.7a3cb11b@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com>
On Mon, 2017-04-24 at 14:55 +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 11:47:48 +1000
> > Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2017-03-30 at 22:10 +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> > > There are some windows in opal entry/exit that can not recover from a
> > > re-entrant interrupt (e.g., machine check) due to using SRR registers,
> > > but they currently do not have MSR_RI clear.
> > >
> > > These were found by machine check injection coverage tests using the
> > > powerpc system simulator (Mambo).
> >
> > So you make us enter/exit OPAL with RI off with your patch.
>
> It should hrfid to opal with MSR_RI set. It seems to be doing the right
> thing when stepping through it with the simulator.
Ok, it's me mis-reading it...
I am not fan of changing FIXUP_ENDIAN but I suppose we don't have much
choice. This will slow down OPAL entry/exit further...maybe we should
use HSRR0/1 instead ? That way we don't have to touch RI ...
Cheers,
Ben.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-24 5:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-30 12:10 [PATCH] powerpc/powernv: Fix opal entry/exit MSR_RI coverage Nicholas Piggin
2017-04-24 1:47 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2017-04-24 4:55 ` Nicholas Piggin
2017-04-24 5:09 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2017-04-24 5:18 ` Nicholas Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1493010542.25766.201.camel@kernel.crashing.org \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).