From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from host.buserror.net (host.buserror.net [209.198.135.123]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3wGsyc4zWjzDq5W for ; Tue, 2 May 2017 04:14:48 +1000 (AEST) Message-ID: <1493662461.25397.29.camel@buserror.net> From: Scott Wood To: christophe leroy Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Michael Ellerman , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Mon, 01 May 2017 13:14:21 -0500 In-Reply-To: References: <20170309094204.ACF5567992@localhost.localdomain> <20170430064826.fags33gcyvpqigah@home.buserror.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: powerpc/8xx: Adding support of IRQ in MPC8xx GPIO List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 2017-05-01 at 09:46 +0200, christophe leroy wrote: > > Le 30/04/2017 à 08:48, Scott Wood a écrit : > > On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 10:42:04AM +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote: > > > > > > @@ -625,6 +641,14 @@ int cpm1_gpiochip_add16(struct device_node *np) > > > > > >   spin_lock_init(&cpm1_gc->lock); > > > > > > + if (!of_property_read_u16(np, "interrupts-mask", &mask)) { > > > + int i, j; > > > + > > > + for (i = 0, j = 0; i < 16; i++) > > > + if (mask & (1 << (15 - i))) > > > + cpm1_gc->irq[i] = > > > irq_of_parse_and_map(np, j++); > > > + } > > > > Do we really need to use MSB-first bit numbering here? > > Well, I think it is better to keep the GPIOs in the same order as in the  > CPM1 registers, like everywhere else in that driver, isn't it ? > > The registers have GPIO 0 in the MSB and GPIO15 in the LSB. OK, if there's a specific register this is reflecting that's reasonable. -Scott