From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtprelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0104.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.104]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3x7kb03RNbzDqk6 for ; Fri, 14 Jul 2017 04:18:19 +1000 (AEST) Message-ID: <1499969891.4457.59.camel@perches.com> Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: fsl_asrc: constify snd_soc_dai_ops structure From: Joe Perches To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" , Mark Brown Cc: Takashi Iwai , Timur Tabi , Nicolin Chen , Xiubo Li , Fabio Estevam , Liam Girdwood , Jaroslav Kysela , Takashi Iwai , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 11:18:11 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20170713101814.Horde.q8OhHejhvSALVEt2o11aUTW@gator4166.hostgator.com> References: <20170713072351.GA1485@embeddedgus> <20170713101630.odml56qmsvgxqj64@sirena.org.uk> <20170713101814.Horde.q8OhHejhvSALVEt2o11aUTW@gator4166.hostgator.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Mime-Version: 1.0 List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, 2017-07-13 at 10:18 -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > Hi Mark, > > Quoting Mark Brown : > > > On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 09:32:41AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > > > > please stop posting in this style. It's really annoying to see > > > spontaneously popping-up almost same patch for more than two hours > > > long. > > > If you have a series of the same fix patches, send them as a patch > > > set in a shot with a thread. git-send-email does it right. > > > I don't mind a couple of patches posted separately, but this is over > > > the limit. > > > > Or at least just collect them up and send them all at one time even if > > not as a single thread (you don't want to CC everyone affected by a > > single patch in the set on everything, that's harder to avoid when > > sending a series via git, but it can be confusing to get one item in a > > large patch series without context). > > I like this idea better. I will do so next time. :) I don't it's better. It's not that confusing if the 0/n patch cover letter is cc'd to all the appropriate mailing lists and all the [1..n]/n patches are sent with in-reply-to of the cover letter and send to the maintainers and appropriate mailing lists.