From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qt0-x242.google.com (mail-qt0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3x9CPc5Gn5zDqmT for ; Sun, 16 Jul 2017 14:00:20 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-qt0-x242.google.com with SMTP id w12so14717899qta.2 for ; Sat, 15 Jul 2017 21:00:20 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Ram Pai From: Ram Pai To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com, aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, bsingharora@gmail.com, dave.hansen@intel.com, hbabu@us.ibm.com, linuxram@us.ibm.com, arnd@arndb.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, corbet@lwn.net, mingo@redhat.com, mhocko@kernel.org Subject: [RFC v6 55/62] selftest/vm: associate key on a mapped page and detect access violation Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2017 20:56:57 -0700 Message-Id: <1500177424-13695-56-git-send-email-linuxram@us.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <1500177424-13695-1-git-send-email-linuxram@us.ibm.com> References: <1500177424-13695-1-git-send-email-linuxram@us.ibm.com> List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , detect access-violation on a page to which access-disabled key is associated much after the page is mapped. Signed-off-by: Ram Pai --- tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c index 37645a5..bf27bcd 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c @@ -1008,6 +1008,24 @@ void test_read_of_access_disabled_region(int *ptr, u16 pkey) dprintf1("*ptr: %d\n", ptr_contents); expected_pkey_fault(pkey); } + +void test_read_of_access_disabled_region_with_page_already_mapped(int *ptr, + u16 pkey) +{ + int ptr_contents; + + dprintf1("disabling access to PKEY[%02d], doing read @ %p\n", + pkey, ptr); + ptr_contents = read_ptr(ptr); + dprintf1("reading ptr before disabling the read : %d\n", + ptr_contents); + rdpkey_reg(); + pkey_access_deny(pkey); + ptr_contents = read_ptr(ptr); + dprintf1("*ptr: %d\n", ptr_contents); + expected_pkey_fault(pkey); +} + void test_write_of_write_disabled_region(int *ptr, u16 pkey) { dprintf1("disabling write access to PKEY[%02d], doing write\n", pkey); @@ -1303,6 +1321,7 @@ void test_mprotect_pkey_on_unsupported_cpu(int *ptr, u16 pkey) void (*pkey_tests[])(int *ptr, u16 pkey) = { test_read_of_write_disabled_region, test_read_of_access_disabled_region, + test_read_of_access_disabled_region_with_page_already_mapped, test_write_of_write_disabled_region, test_write_of_access_disabled_region, test_kernel_write_of_access_disabled_region, -- 1.7.1