From: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, peterz@infradead.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, kirill@shutemov.name,
ak@linux.intel.com, mhocko@kernel.org, dave@stgolabs.net,
jack@suse.cz, Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
benh@kernel.crashing.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, paulus@samba.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
hpa@zytor.com, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
haren@linux.vnet.ibm.com, khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
npiggin@gmail.com, bsingharora@gmail.com,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, x86@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 04/16] mm: VMA sequence count
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2017 16:35:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1502202949-8138-5-git-send-email-ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1502202949-8138-1-git-send-email-ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Wrap the VMA modifications (vma_adjust/unmap_page_range) with sequence
counts such that we can easily test if a VMA is changed.
The unmap_page_range() one allows us to make assumptions about
page-tables; when we find the seqcount hasn't changed we can assume
page-tables are still valid.
The flip side is that we cannot distinguish between a vma_adjust() and
the unmap_page_range() -- where with the former we could have
re-checked the vma bounds against the address.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
[Port to 4.12 kernel]
[Fix lock dependency between mapping->i_mmap_rwsem and vma->vm_sequence]
Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
include/linux/mm_types.h | 1 +
mm/memory.c | 2 ++
mm/mmap.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++---
3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/mm_types.h b/include/linux/mm_types.h
index 7f384bb62d8e..d7d6dae4c009 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm_types.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm_types.h
@@ -342,6 +342,7 @@ struct vm_area_struct {
struct mempolicy *vm_policy; /* NUMA policy for the VMA */
#endif
struct vm_userfaultfd_ctx vm_userfaultfd_ctx;
+ seqcount_t vm_sequence;
} __randomize_layout;
struct core_thread {
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 11c5fe5f62bb..7d61f64916a2 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -1380,6 +1380,7 @@ void unmap_page_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
unsigned long next;
BUG_ON(addr >= end);
+ write_seqcount_begin(&vma->vm_sequence);
tlb_start_vma(tlb, vma);
pgd = pgd_offset(vma->vm_mm, addr);
do {
@@ -1389,6 +1390,7 @@ void unmap_page_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
next = zap_p4d_range(tlb, vma, pgd, addr, next, details);
} while (pgd++, addr = next, addr != end);
tlb_end_vma(tlb, vma);
+ write_seqcount_end(&vma->vm_sequence);
}
diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
index f19efcf75418..140b22136cb7 100644
--- a/mm/mmap.c
+++ b/mm/mmap.c
@@ -557,6 +557,8 @@ void __vma_link_rb(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
else
mm->highest_vm_end = vm_end_gap(vma);
+ seqcount_init(&vma->vm_sequence);
+
/*
* vma->vm_prev wasn't known when we followed the rbtree to find the
* correct insertion point for that vma. As a result, we could not
@@ -798,6 +800,11 @@ int __vma_adjust(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start,
}
}
+ write_seqcount_begin(&vma->vm_sequence);
+ if (next && next != vma)
+ write_seqcount_begin_nested(&next->vm_sequence,
+ SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
+
anon_vma = vma->anon_vma;
if (!anon_vma && adjust_next)
anon_vma = next->anon_vma;
@@ -902,6 +909,7 @@ int __vma_adjust(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start,
mm->map_count--;
mpol_put(vma_policy(next));
kmem_cache_free(vm_area_cachep, next);
+ write_seqcount_end(&next->vm_sequence);
/*
* In mprotect's case 6 (see comments on vma_merge),
* we must remove another next too. It would clutter
@@ -931,11 +939,14 @@ int __vma_adjust(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start,
if (remove_next == 2) {
remove_next = 1;
end = next->vm_end;
+ write_seqcount_end(&vma->vm_sequence);
goto again;
- }
- else if (next)
+ } else if (next) {
+ if (next != vma)
+ write_seqcount_begin_nested(&next->vm_sequence,
+ SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
vma_gap_update(next);
- else {
+ } else {
/*
* If remove_next == 2 we obviously can't
* reach this path.
@@ -961,6 +972,10 @@ int __vma_adjust(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start,
if (insert && file)
uprobe_mmap(insert);
+ if (next && next != vma)
+ write_seqcount_end(&next->vm_sequence);
+ write_seqcount_end(&vma->vm_sequence);
+
validate_mm(mm);
return 0;
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-08 14:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-08 14:35 [PATCH 00/16] Speculative page faults Laurent Dufour
2017-08-08 14:35 ` [PATCH 01/16] mm: Dont assume page-table invariance during faults Laurent Dufour
2017-08-08 14:35 ` [PATCH 02/16] mm: Prepare for FAULT_FLAG_SPECULATIVE Laurent Dufour
2017-08-09 10:08 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2017-08-09 10:54 ` Laurent Dufour
2017-08-08 14:35 ` [PATCH 03/16] mm: Introduce pte_spinlock " Laurent Dufour
2017-08-08 14:35 ` Laurent Dufour [this message]
2017-08-08 14:35 ` [PATCH 05/16] mm: Protect VMA modifications using VMA sequence count Laurent Dufour
2017-08-09 10:12 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2017-08-09 10:43 ` Laurent Dufour
2017-08-10 0:58 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2017-08-10 8:27 ` Laurent Dufour
2017-08-10 13:43 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2017-08-10 18:16 ` Laurent Dufour
2017-08-08 14:35 ` [PATCH 06/16] mm: RCU free VMAs Laurent Dufour
2017-08-08 14:35 ` [PATCH 07/16] mm: Provide speculative fault infrastructure Laurent Dufour
2017-08-08 14:35 ` [PATCH 08/16] mm: Try spin lock in speculative path Laurent Dufour
2017-08-08 14:35 ` [PATCH 09/16] x86/mm: Add speculative pagefault handling Laurent Dufour
2017-08-08 14:35 ` [PATCH 10/16] powerpc/mm: Add speculative page fault Laurent Dufour
2017-08-08 14:35 ` [PATCH 11/16] mm: Introduce __page_add_new_anon_rmap() Laurent Dufour
2017-08-08 14:35 ` [PATCH 12/16] mm: Protect SPF handler against anon_vma changes Laurent Dufour
2017-08-08 14:35 ` [PATCH 13/16] perf: Add a speculative page fault sw events Laurent Dufour
2017-08-09 13:18 ` Michael Ellerman
2017-08-09 13:25 ` Laurent Dufour
2017-08-08 14:35 ` [PATCH 14/16] x86/mm: Add support for SPF events Laurent Dufour
2017-08-08 14:35 ` [PATCH 15/16] powerpc/mm: " Laurent Dufour
2017-08-08 14:35 ` [PATCH 16/16] perf tools: " Laurent Dufour
2017-08-09 1:43 ` Anshuman Khandual
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1502202949-8138-5-git-send-email-ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=haren@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).