From: Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@infinera.com>
To: "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"benh@kernel.crashing.org" <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: UIO memmap of PCi devices not working?
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 08:59:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1504774792.31322.13.camel@infinera.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1504773212.12628.26.camel@kernel.crashing.org>
On Thu, 2017-09-07 at 18:33 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-09-07 at 07:22 +0000, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > On Thu, 2017-09-07 at 17:16 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 15:20 +0000, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > > > Having problems to mmap PCI UIO devices and stumbeled over this pag=
e:
> > > > http://billfarrow.blogspot.se/2010/09/userspace-access-to-pci-memo=
ry.html
> > > > it claims some adjustments are needed for UIO mmap over PCI to work=
.
> > > > These are #if 0 ATM and trying to enable them fails build.
> > > >=20
> > > > Can this be fixed to at least build again ?
> > > > The reason for having #if 0 in the first place appears to be old X =
servers,
> > > > is that still true? Can the special casing be removed now?
> > >=20
> > > This article seems out of date... I *think* things should work withou=
t
> > > change by just mmap'ing the appropriate sysfs files. I'm not sure why
> > > the author thought that had to be ifdef'ed out...
> >=20
> > Isn't that what the article is doing(mmaping sysfs files)?
> > And the article author is #ifdefing it back, not out.
>=20
> Yes sorry that's what I meant. It should work as-is.
>=20
> > >=20
> > > Let me know if you have problems.
> >=20
> > Sure, we still are looking=20
> >=20
> > >=20
> > > As far as I know, the generic code will call pci_resource_to_user()
> > > which on powerpc will return a physical address that already includes
> > > the offset, which is why we don't later add it.
> > >=20
> > > Now we could probably tear all that out and use the new generic code
> > > instead as I *think* X has (very) long been fixed but I'd have to spe=
nd
> > > some time triple checking and testing on old HW which I don't have th=
e
> > > bandwidth for right now.=20
> >=20
> > Could you fixup the code which is now #if 0 ? I wan't to test the
> > difference and I not sure how to fix the build problem after changing
> > those two #if 0 to #if 1
> > Even better if they could be a CONFIG option instead.
>=20
> Hrm it's tricky, you shouldn't just turn that ifdef back on without
> also changing pci_resource_to_user().
There are two ifdef to change:
__pci_mmap_make_offset():
#if 0 /* See comment in pci_resource_to_user() for why this is disabled */
*offset +=3D hose->pci_mem_offset;
#endif
and
pci_resource_to_user()
/* We pass a fully fixed up address to userland for MMIO instead of
* a BAR value because X is lame and expects to be able to use that
* to pass to /dev/mem !
*
* That means that we'll have potentially 64 bits values where some
* userland apps only expect 32 (like X itself since it thinks only
* Sparc has 64 bits MMIO) but if we don't do that, we break it on
* 32 bits CHRPs :-(
*
* Hopefully, the sysfs insterface is immune to that gunk. Once X
* has been fixed (and the fix spread enough), we can re-enable the
* 2 lines below and pass down a BAR value to userland. In that case
* we'll also have to re-enable the matching code in
* __pci_mmap_make_offset().
*
* BenH.
*/
#if 0
else if (rsrc->flags & IORESOURCE_MEM)
offset =3D hose->pci_mem_offset;
#endif
Problem is that pci_mem_offset is gone, the closed I can find is mem_offset
but that is an array,maybe just mem_offset[0] ?
> I'm not sure exactly what's going
> on in your case, if you have a problem can you add printk to instrument
> ?
Seems to be something else going on in out board. Anyhow, the mem_offset sh=
ould
be fixed to compile, nice to have it behind a CONFIG option. Then
one can start the process to remove the special casing easier.
Jocke=
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-07 9:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-06 15:20 UIO memmap of PCi devices not working? Joakim Tjernlund
2017-09-07 7:16 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2017-09-07 7:22 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2017-09-07 8:33 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2017-09-07 8:59 ` Joakim Tjernlund [this message]
2017-09-07 10:19 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2017-09-07 22:23 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2017-09-07 22:22 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1504774792.31322.13.camel@infinera.com \
--to=joakim.tjernlund@infinera.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).