From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qt0-x241.google.com (mail-qt0-x241.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3yVmjx1chlzDr5S for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2017 20:00:37 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by mail-qt0-x241.google.com with SMTP id j58so10032832qtj.0 for ; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 01:00:37 -0800 (PST) Sender: Ram Pai From: Ram Pai To: mpe@ellerman.id.au, mingo@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, corbet@lwn.net, arnd@arndb.de Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dave.hansen@intel.com, benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org, khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com, aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, bsingharora@gmail.com, hbabu@us.ibm.com, mhocko@kernel.org, bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com, ebiederm@xmission.com, linuxram@us.ibm.com Subject: [PATCH v9 47/51] selftest/vm: associate key on a mapped page and detect write violation Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 00:57:39 -0800 Message-Id: <1509958663-18737-48-git-send-email-linuxram@us.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <1509958663-18737-1-git-send-email-linuxram@us.ibm.com> References: <1509958663-18737-1-git-send-email-linuxram@us.ibm.com> List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , detect write-violation on a page to which write-disabled key is associated much after the page is mapped. Signed-off-by: Ram Pai --- tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c index 998a44f..0b7b826 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c @@ -1033,6 +1033,17 @@ void test_read_of_access_disabled_region_with_page_already_mapped(int *ptr, expected_pkey_fault(pkey); } +void test_write_of_write_disabled_region_with_page_already_mapped(int *ptr, + u16 pkey) +{ + *ptr = __LINE__; + dprintf1("disabling write access; after accessing the page, " + "to PKEY[%02d], doing write\n", pkey); + pkey_write_deny(pkey); + *ptr = __LINE__; + expected_pkey_fault(pkey); +} + void test_write_of_write_disabled_region(int *ptr, u16 pkey) { dprintf1("disabling write access to PKEY[%02d], doing write\n", pkey); @@ -1329,6 +1340,7 @@ void test_mprotect_pkey_on_unsupported_cpu(int *ptr, u16 pkey) test_read_of_access_disabled_region, test_read_of_access_disabled_region_with_page_already_mapped, test_write_of_write_disabled_region, + test_write_of_write_disabled_region_with_page_already_mapped, test_write_of_access_disabled_region, test_kernel_write_of_access_disabled_region, test_kernel_write_of_write_disabled_region, -- 1.7.1