From: Gustavo Romero <gromero@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: cyrilbur@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/tm: Fix endianness flip on trap
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2017 18:20:45 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1514762446-1323-1-git-send-email-gromero@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
Currently it's possible that a thread on PPC64 LE has its endianness
flipped inadvertently to Big-Endian resulting in a crash once the process
is back from the signal handler.
If giveup_all() is called when regs->msr has the bits MSR.FP and MSR.VEC
disabled (and hence MSR.VSX disabled too) it returns without calling
check_if_tm_restore_required() which copies regs->msr to ckpt_regs->msr if
the process caught a signal whilst in transactional mode. Then once in
setup_tm_sigcontexts() MSR from ckpt_regs.msr is used, but since
check_if_tm_restore_required() was not called previuosly, gp_regs[PT_MSR]
gets a copy of invalid MSR bits as MSR in ckpt_regs was not updated from
regs->msr and so is zeroed. Later when leaving the signal handler once in
sys_rt_sigreturn() the TS bits of gp_regs[PT_MSR] are checked to determine
if restore_tm_sigcontexts() must be called to pull in the correct MSR state
into the user context. Because TS bits are zeroed
restore_tm_sigcontexts() is never called and MSR restored from the user
context on returning from the signal handler has the MSR.LE (the endianness
bit) forced to zero (Big-Endian). That leads, for instance, to 'nop' being
treated as an illegal instruction in the following sequence:
tbegin.
beq 1f
trap
tend.
1: nop
on PPC64 LE machines and the process dies just after returning from the
signal handler.
PPC64 BE is also affected but in a subtle way since forcing Big-Endian on
a BE machine does not change the endianness.
This commit fixes the issue described above by ensuring that once in
setup_tm_sigcontexts() the MSR used is from regs->msr instead of from
ckpt_regs->msr and by ensuring that we pull in only the MSR.FP, MSR.VEC,
and MSR.VSX bits from ckpt_regs->msr.
The fix was tested both on LE and BE machines and no regression regarding
the powerpc/tm selftests was observed.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Romero <gromero@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_64.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_64.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_64.c
index 4b9ca35..b1b9962 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_64.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal_64.c
@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ static long setup_tm_sigcontexts(struct sigcontext __user *sc,
elf_vrreg_t __user *tm_v_regs = sigcontext_vmx_regs(tm_sc);
#endif
struct pt_regs *regs = tsk->thread.regs;
- unsigned long msr = tsk->thread.ckpt_regs.msr;
+ unsigned long msr = tsk->thread.regs->msr;
long err = 0;
BUG_ON(tsk != current);
@@ -216,6 +216,12 @@ static long setup_tm_sigcontexts(struct sigcontext __user *sc,
WARN_ON(tm_suspend_disabled);
+ /* Restore checkpointed FP, VEC, and VSX bits from ckpt_regs as
+ * it contains the correct FP, VEC, VSX state after we treclaimed
+ * the transaction and giveup_all() was called on reclaiming.
+ */
+ msr |= tsk->thread.ckpt_regs.msr & (MSR_FP | MSR_VEC | MSR_VSX);
+
/* Remove TM bits from thread's MSR. The MSR in the sigcontext
* just indicates to userland that we were doing a transaction, but we
* don't want to return in transactional state. This also ensures
--
2.7.4
next reply other threads:[~2017-12-31 23:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-31 23:20 Gustavo Romero [this message]
2017-12-31 23:20 ` [PATCH 2/2] powerpc/selftests: Check endianness on trap in TM Gustavo Romero
2018-01-22 3:34 ` [1/2] powerpc/tm: Fix endianness flip on trap Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1514762446-1323-1-git-send-email-gromero@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=gromero@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=cyrilbur@gmail.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).