From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qt0-x244.google.com (mail-qt0-x244.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3zN3jg1ZzGzF0nJ for ; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 12:52:23 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by mail-qt0-x244.google.com with SMTP id m59so420052qte.11 for ; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 17:52:23 -0800 (PST) Sender: Ram Pai From: Ram Pai To: mpe@ellerman.id.au, mingo@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, corbet@lwn.net, arnd@arndb.de Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dave.hansen@intel.com, benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org, khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com, aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, bsingharora@gmail.com, hbabu@us.ibm.com, mhocko@kernel.org, bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com, ebiederm@xmission.com, linuxram@us.ibm.com Subject: [PATCH v10 13/27] powerpc: implementation for arch_override_mprotect_pkey() Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 17:50:34 -0800 Message-Id: <1516326648-22775-14-git-send-email-linuxram@us.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <1516326648-22775-1-git-send-email-linuxram@us.ibm.com> References: <1516326648-22775-1-git-send-email-linuxram@us.ibm.com> List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , arch independent code calls arch_override_mprotect_pkey() to return a pkey that best matches the requested protection. This patch provides the implementation. Signed-off-by: Ram Pai --- arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu_context.h | 5 ++++ arch/powerpc/include/asm/pkeys.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++- arch/powerpc/mm/pkeys.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu_context.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu_context.h index 4d69223..3ba571d 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu_context.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu_context.h @@ -198,6 +198,11 @@ static inline bool arch_vma_access_permitted(struct vm_area_struct *vma, #define thread_pkey_regs_save(thread) #define thread_pkey_regs_restore(new_thread, old_thread) #define thread_pkey_regs_init(thread) + +static inline int vma_pkey(struct vm_area_struct *vma) +{ + return 0; +} #endif /* CONFIG_PPC_MEM_KEYS */ #endif /* __KERNEL__ */ diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pkeys.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pkeys.h index c7cc433..0a643b8 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pkeys.h +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pkeys.h @@ -52,6 +52,13 @@ static inline u64 pkey_to_vmflag_bits(u16 pkey) return (((u64)pkey << VM_PKEY_SHIFT) & ARCH_VM_PKEY_FLAGS); } +static inline int vma_pkey(struct vm_area_struct *vma) +{ + if (static_branch_likely(&pkey_disabled)) + return 0; + return (vma->vm_flags & ARCH_VM_PKEY_FLAGS) >> VM_PKEY_SHIFT; +} + #define arch_max_pkey() pkeys_total #define pkey_alloc_mask(pkey) (0x1 << pkey) @@ -148,10 +155,22 @@ static inline int execute_only_pkey(struct mm_struct *mm) return __execute_only_pkey(mm); } +extern int __arch_override_mprotect_pkey(struct vm_area_struct *vma, + int prot, int pkey); static inline int arch_override_mprotect_pkey(struct vm_area_struct *vma, int prot, int pkey) { - return 0; + if (static_branch_likely(&pkey_disabled)) + return 0; + + /* + * Is this an mprotect_pkey() call? If so, never override the value that + * came from the user. + */ + if (pkey != -1) + return pkey; + + return __arch_override_mprotect_pkey(vma, prot, pkey); } extern int __arch_set_user_pkey_access(struct task_struct *tsk, int pkey, diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/pkeys.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/pkeys.c index ee31ab5..7630c2f 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/pkeys.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/pkeys.c @@ -326,3 +326,39 @@ int __execute_only_pkey(struct mm_struct *mm) mm->context.execute_only_pkey = execute_only_pkey; return execute_only_pkey; } + +static inline bool vma_is_pkey_exec_only(struct vm_area_struct *vma) +{ + /* Do this check first since the vm_flags should be hot */ + if ((vma->vm_flags & (VM_READ | VM_WRITE | VM_EXEC)) != VM_EXEC) + return false; + + return (vma_pkey(vma) == vma->vm_mm->context.execute_only_pkey); +} + +/* + * This should only be called for *plain* mprotect calls. + */ +int __arch_override_mprotect_pkey(struct vm_area_struct *vma, int prot, + int pkey) +{ + /* + * If the currently associated pkey is execute-only, but the requested + * protection requires read or write, move it back to the default pkey. + */ + if (vma_is_pkey_exec_only(vma) && (prot & (PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE))) + return 0; + + /* + * The requested protection is execute-only. Hence let's use an + * execute-only pkey. + */ + if (prot == PROT_EXEC) { + pkey = execute_only_pkey(vma->vm_mm); + if (pkey > 0) + return pkey; + } + + /* Nothing to override. */ + return vma_pkey(vma); +} -- 1.7.1