From: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
To: Cyril Bur <cyrilbur@gmail.com>,
benh@kernel.crashing.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 10/12] [WIP] powerpc/tm: Correctly save/restore checkpointed sprs
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 14:00:30 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1519095630.7360.57.camel@neuling.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180220002241.29648-11-cyrilbur@gmail.com>
This needs a description of what you're trying to do. "Correctly" doesn't
really mean anything.
On Tue, 2018-02-20 at 11:22 +1100, Cyril Bur wrote:
> ---
> arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++=
++++-
> -
> arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c | 9 +++----
> 2 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>=20
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.=
c
> index cd3ae80a6878..674f75c56172 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
> @@ -859,6 +859,8 @@ static inline bool tm_enabled(struct task_struct *tsk=
)
> return tsk && tsk->thread.regs && (tsk->thread.regs->msr & MSR_TM);
> }
> =20
> +static inline void save_sprs(struct thread_struct *t);
> +
> static void tm_reclaim_thread(struct thread_struct *thr, uint8_t cause)
> {
> /*
> @@ -879,6 +881,8 @@ static void tm_reclaim_thread(struct thread_struct *t=
hr,
> uint8_t cause)
> if (!MSR_TM_SUSPENDED(mfmsr()))
> return;
> =20
> + save_sprs(thr);
> +
> giveup_all(container_of(thr, struct task_struct, thread));
> =20
> tm_reclaim(thr, cause);
> @@ -991,6 +995,37 @@ void tm_recheckpoint(struct thread_struct *thread)
> =20
> __tm_recheckpoint(thread);
> =20
> + /*
> + * This is a stripped down restore_sprs(), we need to do this
> + * now as we might go straight out to userspace and currently
> + * the checkpointed values are on the CPU.
> + *
> + * TODO: Improve
> + */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ALTIVEC
> + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ALTIVEC))
> + mtspr(SPRN_VRSAVE, thread->vrsave);
> +#endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64
> + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_DSCR)) {
> + u64 dscr =3D get_paca()->dscr_default;
> + if (thread->dscr_inherit)
> + dscr =3D thread->dscr;
> +
> + mtspr(SPRN_DSCR, dscr);
> + }
> +
> + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_207S)) {
> + /* The EBB regs aren't checkpointed */
> + mtspr(SPRN_FSCR, thread->fscr);
> +
> + mtspr(SPRN_TAR, thread->tar);
> + }
> +
> + /* I think we don't need to */
> + if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ARCH_300))
> + mtspr(SPRN_TIDR, thread->tidr);
> +#endif
Why are you touching all the above hunk?
> local_irq_restore(flags);
> }
> =20
> @@ -1193,6 +1228,11 @@ struct task_struct *__switch_to(struct task_struct
> *prev,
> #endif
> =20
> new_thread =3D &new->thread;
> + /*
> + * Why not &prev->thread; ?
> + * What is the difference between &prev->thread and
> + * ¤t->thread ?
> + */
Why not just work it out and FIX THE CODE, rather than just rabbiting on ab=
out
it! :-P
> old_thread =3D ¤t->thread;
> =20
> WARN_ON(!irqs_disabled());
> @@ -1237,8 +1277,16 @@ struct task_struct *__switch_to(struct task_struct
> *prev,
> /*
> * We need to save SPRs before treclaim/trecheckpoint as these will
> * change a number of them.
> + *
> + * Because we're now reclaiming on kernel entry, we've had to
> + * already save them. Don't do it again.
> + * Note: To deliver a signal in the signal context, we'll have
> + * turned off TM because we don't want the signal context to
> + * have the transactional state of the main thread - what if
> + * we go through switch to at that point? Can we?
> */
> - save_sprs(&prev->thread);
> + if (!prev->thread.regs || !MSR_TM_ACTIVE(prev->thread.regs->msr))
> + save_sprs(&prev->thread);
> =20
> /* Save FPU, Altivec, VSX and SPE state */
> giveup_all(prev);
> @@ -1260,8 +1308,13 @@ struct task_struct *__switch_to(struct task_struct
> *prev,
> * for this is we manually create a stack frame for new tasks that
> * directly returns through ret_from_fork() or
> * ret_from_kernel_thread(). See copy_thread() for details.
> + *
> + * It isn't stricly nessesary that we avoid the restore here
> + * because we'll simply restore again after the recheckpoint,
> + * but we can avoid it for performance reasons.
> */
> - restore_sprs(old_thread, new_thread);
> + if (!new_thread->regs || !MSR_TM_ACTIVE(new_thread->regs->msr))
> + restore_sprs(old_thread, new_thread);
> =20
> last =3D _switch(old_thread, new_thread);
> =20
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c
> index ca72d7391d40..16001987ba71 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c
> @@ -135,12 +135,9 @@ static void flush_tmregs_to_thread(struct task_struc=
t
> *tsk)
> if ((!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_TM)) || (tsk !=3D current))
> return;
> =20
> - if (MSR_TM_SUSPENDED(mfmsr())) {
> - tm_reclaim_current(TM_CAUSE_SIGNAL);
> - } else {
> - tm_enable();
> - tm_save_sprs(&(tsk->thread));
> - }
> + BUG_ON(MSR_TM_SUSPENDED(mfmsr()));
> + tm_enable();
> + tm_save_sprs(&(tsk->thread));
> }
> #else
> static inline void flush_tmregs_to_thread(struct task_struct *tsk) { }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-20 3:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-20 0:22 [RFC PATCH 00/12] Deal with TM on kernel entry and exit Cyril Bur
2018-02-20 0:22 ` [RFC PATCH 01/12] powerpc/tm: Remove struct thread_info param from tm_reclaim_thread() Cyril Bur
2018-02-20 0:22 ` [RFC PATCH 02/12] selftests/powerpc: Fix tm.h helpers Cyril Bur
2018-02-20 0:22 ` [RFC PATCH 03/12] selftests/powerpc: Add tm-signal-drop-transaction TM test Cyril Bur
2018-02-20 0:22 ` [RFC PATCH 04/12] selftests/powerpc: Use less common thread names Cyril Bur
2018-02-20 0:22 ` [RFC PATCH 05/12] [WIP] powerpc/tm: Reclaim/recheckpoint on entry/exit Cyril Bur
2018-02-20 2:50 ` Michael Neuling
2018-02-20 3:54 ` Cyril Bur
2018-02-20 5:25 ` Michael Neuling
2018-02-20 6:32 ` Cyril Bur
2018-02-20 0:22 ` [RFC PATCH 06/12] [WIP] powerpc/tm: Remove dead code from __switch_to_tm() Cyril Bur
2018-02-20 2:52 ` Michael Neuling
2018-02-20 3:43 ` Cyril Bur
2018-02-20 0:22 ` [RFC PATCH 07/12] [WIP] powerpc/tm: Add TM_KERNEL_ENTRY in more delicate exception pathes Cyril Bur
2018-02-20 0:22 ` [RFC PATCH 08/12] [WIP] powerpc/tm: Fix *unavailable_tm exceptions Cyril Bur
2018-02-20 0:22 ` [RFC PATCH 09/12] [WIP] powerpc/tm: Tweak signal code to handle new reclaim/recheckpoint times Cyril Bur
2018-02-20 0:22 ` [RFC PATCH 10/12] [WIP] powerpc/tm: Correctly save/restore checkpointed sprs Cyril Bur
2018-02-20 3:00 ` Michael Neuling [this message]
2018-02-20 3:59 ` Cyril Bur
2018-02-20 5:27 ` Michael Neuling
2018-02-20 0:22 ` [RFC PATCH 11/12] [WIP] powerpc/tm: Afterthoughts Cyril Bur
2018-02-20 0:22 ` [RFC PATCH 12/12] [WIP] selftests/powerpc: Remove incorrect tm-syscall selftest Cyril Bur
2018-02-20 3:04 ` Michael Neuling
2018-02-20 3:42 ` Cyril Bur
2018-06-13 22:38 ` [RFC,00/12] Deal with TM on kernel entry and exit Breno Leitao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1519095630.7360.57.camel@neuling.org \
--to=mikey@neuling.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=cyrilbur@gmail.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).