From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3zmYnW6vWnzDrLQ for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 21:36:44 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w1LAZ4BK121848 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 05:36:42 -0500 Received: from e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.110]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2g964mapau-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 05:36:42 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 10:36:40 -0000 From: Bharata B Rao To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mwb@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Bharata B Rao Subject: [RFC PATCH v0 1/2] powerpc, drmem: Fix unexpected flag value in ibm, dynamic-memory-v2 Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 16:06:26 +0530 In-Reply-To: <1519209387-29767-1-git-send-email-bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1519209387-29767-1-git-send-email-bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Message-Id: <1519209387-29767-2-git-send-email-bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com> List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Memory addtion and removal by count and indexed-count methods temporarily mark the LMBs that are being added/removed by a special flag value DRMEM_LMB_RESERVED. Accessing flags value directly at a few places without proper accessor method is causing two unexpected side-effects: - DRMEM_LMB_RESERVED bit is becoming part of the flags word of drconf_cell_v2 entries in ibm,dynamic-memory-v2 DT property. - This results in extra drconf_cell entries in ibm,dynamic-memory-v2. For example if 1G memory is added, it leads to one entry for 3 LMBs and 1 separate entry for the last LMB. All the 4 LMBs should be defined by one entry here. Fix this by always accessing the flags by its accessor method drmem_lmb_flags(). Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao --- arch/powerpc/mm/drmem.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/drmem.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/drmem.c index 916844f..3f18036 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/drmem.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/drmem.c @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ static void init_drconf_v2_cell(struct of_drconf_cell_v2 *dr_cell, dr_cell->base_addr = cpu_to_be64(lmb->base_addr); dr_cell->drc_index = cpu_to_be32(lmb->drc_index); dr_cell->aa_index = cpu_to_be32(lmb->aa_index); - dr_cell->flags = cpu_to_be32(lmb->flags); + dr_cell->flags = cpu_to_be32(drmem_lmb_flags(lmb)); } static int drmem_update_dt_v2(struct device_node *memory, @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ static int drmem_update_dt_v2(struct device_node *memory, } if (prev_lmb->aa_index != lmb->aa_index || - prev_lmb->flags != lmb->flags) + drmem_lmb_flags(prev_lmb) != drmem_lmb_flags(lmb)) lmb_sets++; prev_lmb = lmb; @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ static int drmem_update_dt_v2(struct device_node *memory, } if (prev_lmb->aa_index != lmb->aa_index || - prev_lmb->flags != lmb->flags) { + drmem_lmb_flags(prev_lmb) != drmem_lmb_flags(lmb)) { /* end of one set, start of another */ dr_cell->seq_lmbs = cpu_to_be32(seq_lmbs); dr_cell++; -- 2.7.4