linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell Currey <ruscur@russell.cc>
To: Sam Bobroff <sam.bobroff@au1.ibm.com>, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] powerpc/eeh: Factor out common code eeh_reset_device()
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2018 16:48:05 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1520315285.2077.14.camel@russell.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fe5673642328c2e11fee269bfc7987095311f25c.1520294174.git.sam.bobroff@au1.ibm.com>

On Tue, 2018-03-06 at 10:59 +1100, Sam Bobroff wrote:
> The caller will always pass NULL for 'rmv_data' when
> 'eeh_aware_driver' is true, so the first two calls to
> eeh_pe_dev_traverse() can be combined without changing behaviour as
> can the two arms of the final 'if' block.
> 
> This should not change behaviour.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sam Bobroff <sam.bobroff@au1.ibm.com>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Russell Currey <ruscur@russell.cc>

minor nitpick below

>  arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c | 36 ++++++++++++----------------
> --------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c
> b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c
> index 1272f2c8cbd2..39d560e9f071 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh_driver.c
> @@ -647,16 +647,12 @@ static int eeh_reset_device(bool
> eeh_aware_driver,
>  	 * into pci_hp_add_devices().
>  	 */
>  	eeh_pe_state_mark(pe, EEH_PE_KEEP);
> -	if (!eeh_aware_driver) {
> -		if (pe->type & EEH_PE_VF) {
> -			eeh_pe_dev_traverse(pe, eeh_rmv_device,
> NULL);
> -		} else {
> -			pci_lock_rescan_remove();
> -			pci_hp_remove_devices(bus);
> -			pci_unlock_rescan_remove();
> -		}
> -	} else {
> +	if (eeh_aware_driver || (pe->type & EEH_PE_VF)) {
>  		eeh_pe_dev_traverse(pe, eeh_rmv_device, rmv_data);
> +	} else {
> +		pci_lock_rescan_remove();
> +		pci_hp_remove_devices(bus);
> +		pci_unlock_rescan_remove();
>  	}
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -691,8 +687,9 @@ static int eeh_reset_device(bool
> eeh_aware_driver,
>  	 * the device up before the scripts have taken it down,
>  	 * potentially weird things happen.
>  	 */
> -	if (!eeh_aware_driver) {
> -		pr_info("EEH: Sleep 5s ahead of complete
> hotplug\n");
> +	if (!eeh_aware_driver || rmv_data->removed) {
> +		pr_info("EEH: Sleep 5s ahead of %s hotplug\n",
> +			(eeh_aware_driver ? "partial" :
> "complete"));
>  		ssleep(5);
>  
>  		/*
> @@ -700,24 +697,15 @@ static int eeh_reset_device(bool
> eeh_aware_driver,
>  		 * PE. We should disconnect it so the binding can be
>  		 * rebuilt when adding PCI devices.
>  		 */
> -		edev = list_first_entry(&pe->edevs, struct eeh_dev,
> list);
> -		eeh_pe_traverse(pe, eeh_pe_detach_dev, NULL);
> -		if (pe->type & EEH_PE_VF) {
> -			eeh_add_virt_device(edev, NULL);
> -		} else {
> -			eeh_pe_state_clear(pe, EEH_PE_PRI_BUS);
> -			pci_hp_add_devices(bus);
> -		}
> -	} else if (rmv_data->removed) {
> -		pr_info("EEH: Sleep 5s ahead of partial hotplug\n");
> -		ssleep(5);
> -
>  		edev = list_first_entry(&pe->edevs, struct eeh_dev,
> list);
>  		eeh_pe_traverse(pe, eeh_pe_detach_dev, NULL);
>  		if (pe->type & EEH_PE_VF)
>  			eeh_add_virt_device(edev, NULL);
> -		else
> +		else {

Put brackets around the if block now that the else block isn't a one
liner

> +			if (!eeh_aware_driver)
> +				eeh_pe_state_clear(pe,
> EEH_PE_PRI_BUS);
>  			pci_hp_add_devices(bus);
> +		}
>  	}
>  	eeh_pe_state_clear(pe, EEH_PE_KEEP);
>  

  reply	other threads:[~2018-03-06  5:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-05 23:58 [PATCH 0/9] EEH refactoring 1 Sam Bobroff
2018-03-05 23:58 ` [PATCH 1/9] powerpc/eeh: Remove eeh_handle_event() Sam Bobroff
2018-03-06  0:44   ` Russell Currey
2018-03-06  1:08   ` Daniel Axtens
2018-03-05 23:58 ` [PATCH 2/9] powerpc/eeh: Manage EEH_PE_RECOVERING inside eeh_handle_normal_event() Sam Bobroff
2018-03-06  0:48   ` Russell Currey
2018-03-06  1:47   ` Daniel Axtens
2018-03-05 23:59 ` [PATCH 3/9] powerpc/eeh: Fix misleading comment in __eeh_addr_cache_get_device() Sam Bobroff
2018-03-06  0:49   ` Russell Currey
2018-03-05 23:59 ` [PATCH 4/9] powerpc/eeh: Remove misleading test in eeh_handle_normal_event() Sam Bobroff
2018-03-06  0:56   ` Russell Currey
2018-03-06  2:14   ` Daniel Axtens
2018-03-05 23:59 ` [PATCH 5/9] powerpc/eeh: Rename frozen_bus to bus " Sam Bobroff
2018-03-06  0:57   ` Russell Currey
2018-03-05 23:59 ` [PATCH 6/9] powerpc/eeh: Clarify arguments to eeh_reset_device() Sam Bobroff
2018-03-06  4:37   ` Russell Currey
2018-03-05 23:59 ` [PATCH 7/9] powerpc/eeh: Remove always-true tests in eeh_reset_device() Sam Bobroff
2018-03-06  4:38   ` Russell Currey
2018-03-05 23:59 ` [PATCH 8/9] powerpc/eeh: Factor out common code eeh_reset_device() Sam Bobroff
2018-03-06  5:48   ` Russell Currey [this message]
2018-03-06  0:00 ` [PATCH 9/9] powerpc/eeh: Add eeh_state_active() helper Sam Bobroff
2018-03-06  5:49   ` Russell Currey
2018-03-07  3:33     ` Sam Bobroff

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1520315285.2077.14.camel@russell.cc \
    --to=ruscur@russell.cc \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=sam.bobroff@au1.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).