From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [103.22.144.67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3qTHnk2MQlzDq7K for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 01:11:54 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from v094114.home.net.pl (v094114.home.net.pl [79.96.170.134]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3qTHnj3cgQz9s5g for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 01:11:52 +1100 (AEDT) From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Viresh Kumar , Shilpasri G Bhat Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, pc@us.ibm.com, shreyas@linux.vnet.ibm.com, anton@samba.org, mikey@neuling.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: powernv: Define per_cpu chip pointer to optimize hot-path Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 15:13:59 +0100 Message-ID: <1527132.IQ7eWgKzaZ@vostro.rjw.lan> In-Reply-To: <20160321072255.GB1803@vireshk-i7> References: <1458274308.6622.79.camel@neuling.org> <1458313100-27676-1-git-send-email-shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20160321072255.GB1803@vireshk-i7> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Monday, March 21, 2016 12:52:55 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 18-03-16, 20:28, Shilpasri G Bhat wrote: > > From: Michael Neuling > > > > "cpufreq: powernv: Remove cpu_to_chip_id() from hot-path" introduced > > If the patch is already committed, you should provide its commit id as well. > > > 'core_to_chip_map' array to cache the chip-id of all cores. Replace > > this with per_cpu variable that stores the pointer to the chip-array. > > This removes the linear lookup and provides a neater and simpler > > solution. > > > > Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling > > Tested-by: Shilpasri G Bhat > > You are sending this patch and you have updated it as well.. So, you should have > had your signed-off here. Right. Plus if you send a patch from anyone else, you should add your sigh-off to it anyway, even if it hasn't been modified. So Shilpasri, please resend with your S-o-b and with the ACK from Viresh. Thanks, Rafael