From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41w0Jg0zP0zF2FN for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2018 04:56:34 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098419.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w7LIs8Z7114276 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2018 14:56:32 -0400 Received: from e36.co.us.ibm.com (e36.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.154]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2m0qadtq4h-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2018 14:56:32 -0400 Received: from localhost by e36.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 21 Aug 2018 12:56:31 -0600 From: Breno Leitao To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: Gustavo Romero , Breno Leitao Subject: [PATCH] selftests/powerpc: Do not fail on TM_CAUSE_RESCHED Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2018 15:56:27 -0300 Message-Id: <1534877787-24359-1-git-send-email-leitao@debian.org> List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , There are cases where the test is not expecting to have the transaction aborted, but, the test process might have been rescheduled, either in the OS level or by KVM (if it is running on a KVM guest machine). The process reschedule will cause a treclaim/recheckpoint which will cause the transaction to doom, failing as soon as the process is rescheduled back to the CPU. This might cause the test to fail, but this is not a failure in essence. If that is the case, TEXASR[FC] is indicated with either TM_CAUSE_RESCHEDULE or TM_CAUSE_KVM_RESCHEDULE for KVM interruptions. In this scenario, ignore these two failures and avoid the whole test to return failure. CC: Gustavo Romero Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao --- tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/tm/tm-unavailable.c | 10 +++++++--- tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/tm/tm.h | 9 +++++++++ 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/tm/tm-unavailable.c b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/tm/tm-unavailable.c index 156c8e750259..0fd793f574c3 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/tm/tm-unavailable.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/tm/tm-unavailable.c @@ -236,7 +236,8 @@ void *tm_una_ping(void *input) } /* Check if we were not expecting a failure and a it occurred. */ - if (!expecting_failure() && is_failure(cr_)) { + if (!expecting_failure() && is_failure(cr_) && + !failure_is_reschedule()) { printf("\n\tUnexpected transaction failure 0x%02lx\n\t", failure_code()); return (void *) -1; @@ -244,9 +245,12 @@ void *tm_una_ping(void *input) /* * Check if TM failed due to the cause we were expecting. 0xda is a - * TM_CAUSE_FAC_UNAV cause, otherwise it's an unexpected cause. + * TM_CAUSE_FAC_UNAV cause, otherwise it's an unexpected cause, unless + * it was caused by a reschedule. */ - if (is_failure(cr_) && !failure_is_unavailable()) { + + if (is_failure(cr_) && !failure_is_unavailable() + & !failure_is_reschedule()) { printf("\n\tUnexpected failure cause 0x%02lx\n\t", failure_code()); return (void *) -1; diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/tm/tm.h b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/tm/tm.h index df4204247d45..5518b1d4ef8b 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/tm/tm.h +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/tm/tm.h @@ -52,6 +52,15 @@ static inline bool failure_is_unavailable(void) return (failure_code() & TM_CAUSE_FAC_UNAV) == TM_CAUSE_FAC_UNAV; } +static inline bool failure_is_reschedule(void) +{ + if ((failure_code() & TM_CAUSE_RESCHED) == TM_CAUSE_RESCHED || + (failure_code() & TM_CAUSE_KVM_RESCHED) == TM_CAUSE_KVM_RESCHED) + return true; + + return false; +} + static inline bool failure_is_nesting(void) { return (__builtin_get_texasru() & 0x400000); -- 2.16.3