From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: In-Reply-To: <20070214001106.GA11491@localhost.localdomain> References: <200702121129.05004.sr@denx.de> <1171281988.20192.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1171310108.20192.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1171311802.20192.15.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20070213004608.GB4894@localhost.localdomain> <8DEFFE52-2326-43A9-9719-15E04EF17D3A@kernel.crashing.org> <20070214001106.GA11491@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <154265F9-EBB3-4BE4-9AD1-3E09BDD9F237@kernel.crashing.org> From: Kumar Gala Subject: Re: [PATCH] ppc: Add support for AMCC Taishan 440GX eval board Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 18:30:40 -0600 To: David Gibson Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Jon Loeliger , Stefan Roese , Roland Dreier , linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Feb 13, 2007, at 6:11 PM, David Gibson wrote: > On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 11:28:17PM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote: >> >> On Feb 12, 2007, at 6:46 PM, David Gibson wrote: >> >>> On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 02:41:36PM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote: >>>> >>>> On Feb 12, 2007, at 2:23 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 14:16 -0600, Jon Loeliger wrote: >>>>>> So, like, the other day Benjamin Herrenschmidt mumbled: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Note that there are still things that we might want to >>>>>>> change. For >>>>>>> example, I think we really should look into adding a macro >>>>>>> mecanism >>>>>>> and/or an include mecanism to dtc so that we can do things like >>>>>>> #include >>>>>>> to get the base processor/SoC definition and then >>>>>>> "overlay" some properties on top of it (like emac phy mode >>>>>>> etc...) >>>>>> >>>>>> What do people prefer here? Straight CPP pre-run? >>>>> >>>>> CPP pre-run has issue, notably due to the usage of "#" in property >>>>> names. >>>> >>>> You can get around that by invoking cpp with the right flags, I >>>> looked at doing this a while back and had it working. >>> >>> Umm.. which flags? >> >> cpp -undef -P -x assembler-with-cpp > > What exactly does the -x assembler-with-cpp do? I can't seem to find > a useful description in the man page or info. I think it treats the input as if where of assembler syntax. And thus # has special meaning in some places. - k