From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6863C43334 for ; Fri, 15 Jul 2022 18:34:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Ll0Pv29thz3cKB for ; Sat, 16 Jul 2022 04:34:27 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=igalia.com header.i=@igalia.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20170329 header.b=T+0xYXeu; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=igalia.com (client-ip=178.60.130.6; helo=fanzine2.igalia.com; envelope-from=gpiccoli@igalia.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=igalia.com header.i=@igalia.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20170329 header.b=T+0xYXeu; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from fanzine2.igalia.com (fanzine.igalia.com [178.60.130.6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Ll0P72yWzz3c5B for ; Sat, 16 Jul 2022 04:33:46 +1000 (AEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=igalia.com; s=20170329; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From: References:Cc:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=eHY8ml2kSNhWyc+Lu2y+Au3hBhDY7pHCci4IztLK7Xc=; b=T+0xYXeuOGrOK3gFQFS+sISKGh SDcLCeRHEaBPMmX4jDC7KMCJofTE7poUJ25T5Hm5Ghl3XGw6nWsSxelviFUhyN/YlhEzgdbj9f5ih olPqVatvSPG5Sc5rZOo06VaWxw6lfj5ZPP2fOAW/5wgVOWaCaY7QSOji3e0Qu1oz+DbUaxNRgKbRX OaOi/f4vU6kiIXqyJ6eCFVFPeLdxxNLk85+O8x5Zq6ixFC3LSE6iIyVwm4PBNS/iq6PyHxOWoKS08 78UnOdFJvuZ13GZT2WXs5AF/18wy9kkVeN0xISlEW/m+DNkWZsbGzOvzLmQUtEjf+9+Rawd9DEcgE AMaaI8/w==; Received: from 201-42-109-188.dsl.telesp.net.br ([201.42.109.188] helo=[192.168.1.60]) by fanzine2.igalia.com with esmtpsa (Cipher TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_128_GCM:128) (Exim) id 1oCQ7j-000aT2-DH; Fri, 15 Jul 2022 20:33:12 +0200 Message-ID: <15432ee0-3a33-0b53-b39b-f8b53a7e4345@igalia.com> Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2022 15:32:56 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] powerpc/pci: Add config option for using OF 'reg' for PCI domain Content-Language: en-US To: =?UTF-8?Q?Pali_Roh=c3=a1r?= References: <20220706102148.5060-1-pali@kernel.org> <17fb8d12-60f9-09d5-91fa-09d5a5a9a4fd@igalia.com> <20220715171132.ujaexzm4ipad7o4f@pali> From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" In-Reply-To: <20220715171132.ujaexzm4ipad7o4f@pali> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Tyrel Datwyler , Guowen Shan , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas , Paul Mackerras , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On 15/07/2022 14:11, Pali Rohár wrote: > [...] >> >> I found this sentence a bit weird, "in the similar way like it is doing >> kernel for other architectures", but other than that: > > If you have some idea how to improve commit description, let me know and > I can change it. > Oh, for example: "in similar way the kernel is doing for other architectures". The sentence idea is perfectly fine, it's just that it's a bit oddly constructed IMHO heh Cheers!