From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: 2.5 development
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 23:11:57 +1100 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <15468.64269.8252.644104@argo.ozlabs.ibm.com> (raw)
Now that Linus has started using BK for 2.5 development, I have set up
a new linuxppc-2.5 tree on ppc.bkbits.net. Its parent is Linus' tree,
which means that we can pull in Linus' changes using BK, instead of
having to apply patches. The linux_2_5 and linuxppc_2_5 trees are
dead, and I will remove them once we are sure we have all the changes
from linuxppc_2_5 committed to the linuxppc-2.5 tree.
The linuxppc-2.5 tree is intended to be a working tree for us in the
same way that the linuxppc_2_4_devel tree was. I have checked in
most of the changes from linuxppc_2_4_devel into linuxppc-2.5.
The current limitations of BK mean that we will not be able to take
changesets directly from the linuxppc-2.5 tree and send them to
Linus. I would suggest that if any of you are working on stuff which
can be isolated as a discrete unit, you can set up a clone of
linux-2.5 where you check in all of the changes for that stuff. Then
pull from there into your linuxppc-2.5 clone to compile and test, and
push to the linuxppc-2.5 tree on ppc.bkbits.net when you are ready for
the rest of us to look at it. When it is time for those changes to go
to Linus, we can get Linus to pull from your repository which has just
those changes (or I can pull and get Linus to pull from my tree).
I have also created for-linus-ppc and for-linus-ppcdrivers trees which
I will use to send stuff to Linus, so I don't want anyone except
myself pushing to those trees. There is also a for-linus-ppc64 tree
which Anton Blanchard will be using to send ppc64 stuff to Linus, so
please don't push to that one either.
Paul.
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next reply other threads:[~2002-02-15 12:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-15 12:11 Paul Mackerras [this message]
2002-02-15 16:40 ` 2.5 development Tom Rini
2002-02-15 16:58 ` Larry McVoy
2002-02-15 17:01 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-02-15 17:06 ` Larry McVoy
2002-02-15 17:17 ` Larry McVoy
2002-02-15 17:32 ` Tom Rini
2002-02-15 17:33 ` Larry McVoy
2002-02-15 17:36 ` Tom Rini
2002-02-15 18:44 ` Larry McVoy
2002-02-15 18:50 ` Tom Rini
2002-02-15 23:53 ` Larry McVoy
[not found] <p05100300b8a144d7cf05@[66.26.75.241]>
2002-02-26 15:51 ` Stefan Jeglinski
2002-02-26 16:13 ` Tom Rini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=15468.64269.8252.644104@argo.ozlabs.ibm.com \
--to=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).