From: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@arm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>,
Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
suzuki.poulose@arm.com, robin.murphy@arm.com,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 03/12] perf/core: add PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_EXCLUDE for exclusion incapable PMUs
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 13:53:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1547128414-50693-4-git-send-email-andrew.murray@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1547128414-50693-1-git-send-email-andrew.murray@arm.com>
Many PMU drivers do not have the capability to exclude counting events
that occur in specific contexts such as idle, kernel, guest, etc. These
drivers indicate this by returning an error in their event_init upon
testing the events attribute flags. This approach is error prone and
often inconsistent.
Let's instead allow PMU drivers to advertise their inability to exclude
based on context via a new capability: PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_EXCLUDE. This
allows the perf core to reject requests for exclusion events where
there is no support in the PMU.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@arm.com>
---
include/linux/perf_event.h | 1 +
kernel/events/core.c | 9 +++++++++
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
index 54a78d2..cec02dc 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -244,6 +244,7 @@ struct perf_event;
#define PERF_PMU_CAP_EXCLUSIVE 0x10
#define PERF_PMU_CAP_ITRACE 0x20
#define PERF_PMU_CAP_HETEROGENEOUS_CPUS 0x40
+#define PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_EXCLUDE 0x80
/**
* struct pmu - generic performance monitoring unit
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 3cd13a3..fbe59b7 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -9772,6 +9772,15 @@ static int perf_try_init_event(struct pmu *pmu, struct perf_event *event)
if (ctx)
perf_event_ctx_unlock(event->group_leader, ctx);
+ if (!ret) {
+ if (pmu->capabilities & PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_EXCLUDE &&
+ event_has_any_exclude_flag(event)) {
+ if (event->destroy)
+ event->destroy(event);
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ }
+ }
+
if (ret)
module_put(pmu->module);
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-10 14:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-10 13:53 [PATCH v5 00/12] perf/core: Generalise event exclusion checking Andrew Murray
2019-01-10 13:53 ` [PATCH v5 01/12] perf/doc: update design.txt for exclude_{host|guest} flags Andrew Murray
2019-01-10 13:53 ` [PATCH v5 02/12] perf/core: add function to test for event exclusion flags Andrew Murray
2019-01-10 13:53 ` Andrew Murray [this message]
2019-01-10 13:53 ` [PATCH v5 04/12] alpha: perf/core: strengthen exclude checks with PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_EXCLUDE Andrew Murray
2019-01-10 13:53 ` [PATCH v5 05/12] arm: perf: conditionally use PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_EXCLUDE Andrew Murray
2019-01-10 13:53 ` [PATCH v5 06/12] arm: perf/core: use PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_EXCLUDE for exclude incapable PMUs Andrew Murray
2019-01-10 13:53 ` [PATCH v5 07/12] drivers/perf: " Andrew Murray
2019-01-10 13:53 ` [PATCH v5 08/12] drivers/perf: perf/core: strengthen exclude checks with PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_EXCLUDE Andrew Murray
2019-01-10 13:53 ` [PATCH v5 09/12] powerpc: perf/core: use PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_EXCLUDE for exclude incapable PMUs Andrew Murray
2019-01-10 13:53 ` [PATCH v5 10/12] x86: " Andrew Murray
2019-01-10 13:53 ` [PATCH v5 11/12] x86: perf/core: strengthen exclude checks with PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_EXCLUDE Andrew Murray
2019-01-10 13:53 ` [PATCH v5 12/12] perf/core: remove unused perf_flags Andrew Murray
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1547128414-50693-4-git-send-email-andrew.murray@arm.com \
--to=andrew.murray@arm.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru \
--cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mattst88@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).