From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3EE7C282C2 for ; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 04:43:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 220FB2084D for ; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 04:43:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="Edt3JNnK" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 220FB2084D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43w5Kb20HnzDqQG for ; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 15:43:15 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from ozlabs.org (bilbo.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43w5Hz3ZsqzDq8g for ; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 15:41:51 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="Edt3JNnK"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from ozlabs.org (bilbo.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::2]) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43w5Hz2jpqz8tPg for ; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 15:41:51 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by ozlabs.org (Postfix) id 43w5Hz2Jnzz9sMM; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 15:41:51 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com (client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::642; helo=mail-pl1-x642.google.com; envelope-from=npiggin@gmail.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="Edt3JNnK"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-pl1-x642.google.com (mail-pl1-x642.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::642]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43w5Hy327Nz9sLw for ; Thu, 7 Feb 2019 15:41:50 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by mail-pl1-x642.google.com with SMTP id b5so4217211plr.4 for ; Wed, 06 Feb 2019 20:41:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:subject:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :user-agent:message-id:content-transfer-encoding; bh=31/Xmb/GU7iAEDGS1igke46kX9BYMX3fQcNNVug920w=; b=Edt3JNnKNvsLWb47bMxFv0jB5fjncjdg/YJUvIK6ocV/XKCY6BavXzQGJqmggmScvO ggF1AQYHJd4ROVDmUuMTfndTKpJx6C5u9QhiUcVDbmn++LlXjRN9TuQHdwLyYKY7/gqx 9dC5m7iFi2Qk2xX/1KVIzrAMvR5lshadorB02v6h6YRoHF/gZa5C2qDprJ8lw+I5+x4i dz8lHJKMDduPv6UZzq5xNYwUyugHyUf7lZ5AcFN2TFFNRW/Up0MsqimNJKPBiurSKnML wSoQEDg2oPhiuZF0Oga4oNY0ZSm4g6SRRiP+5vyuGO1T3Z57Ti08ffomctCRB7iqwJtk ZiTA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:subject:to:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:user-agent:message-id:content-transfer-encoding; bh=31/Xmb/GU7iAEDGS1igke46kX9BYMX3fQcNNVug920w=; b=N2Akj0oiR0ILmTRH94FcfYuFVdLq+Ov3co1uMBex66XATxyyW/fan1WfjQ/8S9O8Qu 6Nijw3ZdHD93yFVUEee5OnKao0FNLL5Jp927ykn44VVaWsUVBhXD5K7/hkRIMp0f/h/R ozuNJA77Lq4l1pmXzGjwAJ+Z5eVatR4F0CUxhkQVhsQMd6JgUxQKOArBaO14BPfGmVnX uG/Ho7Mx3JZYDA9GAk9gl81YZfOJA+rAerVrOqsrdZE2quyg/1E+cXQ8bf6FJGD4YbLZ ccPKdFVRyn1iWnRlqSls5jw5ycZF3LkGMJSaYPVzq34zf3QjEkHaZTEauS94x3Ld3e3j Cw1g== X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAua1q52+OK99SFFqXXsd0JaRZ1Mf6dJBX2zNE0tKpBV3x1HMx6Hz sqE8y7070VsyNxfpizMs049KjAV2 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3Iar/NvPTXaE7TKG45yIAOx2m7PYcmzOAB9XYzXSVj47bs7pFbdL2HX8NEhNxEoSpmZVSFXYYA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:6b0c:: with SMTP id o12mr14689018plk.291.1549514508627; Wed, 06 Feb 2019 20:41:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (193-116-103-101.tpgi.com.au. [193.116.103.101]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v9sm11942730pfg.144.2019.02.06.20.41.47 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 06 Feb 2019 20:41:48 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2019 14:41:41 +1000 From: Nicholas Piggin Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 19/21] powerpc/32: Remove CURRENT_THREAD_INFO and rename TI_CPU To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Michael Ellerman References: <20190205113219.17903-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au> <20190205113219.17903-20-mpe@ellerman.id.au> <1549513559.eo06g2mjtn.astroid@bobo.none> In-Reply-To: <1549513559.eo06g2mjtn.astroid@bobo.none> MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: astroid/0.14.0 (https://github.com/astroidmail/astroid) Message-Id: <1549514388.9uo0adenu4.astroid@bobo.none> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Nicholas Piggin's on February 7, 2019 2:27 pm: > Michael Ellerman's on February 5, 2019 9:32 pm: >> From: Christophe Leroy >>=20 >> Now that thread_info is similar to task_struct, its address is in r2 >> so CURRENT_THREAD_INFO() macro is useless. This patch removes it. >=20 > You wouldn't want to keep CURRENT_THREAD_INFO(r2) to mean get the thread=20 > info out of current, as just a no-op for documentation purpose? I don't=20 > know /32 code at all so it's up to you. I see that I said roughly the opposite last year, if that helps to=20 determine the importance of my opinion. Thanks, Nick =