From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFEB2C04AB1 for ; Thu, 9 May 2019 15:44:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 787882173C for ; Thu, 9 May 2019 15:44:22 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 787882173C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 450HhN4LWKzDqQs for ; Fri, 10 May 2019 01:44:20 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=zohar@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 450Hfk43b7zDqPW for ; Fri, 10 May 2019 01:42:48 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098420.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x49FdK0L047529 for ; Thu, 9 May 2019 11:42:45 -0400 Received: from e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.98]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2scnahdgbp-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 09 May 2019 11:42:36 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 9 May 2019 16:42:30 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.195) by e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.132) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Thu, 9 May 2019 16:42:25 +0100 Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.59]) by b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x49FgOKc61472792 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 9 May 2019 15:42:24 GMT Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83835A4040; Thu, 9 May 2019 15:42:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32B28A4055; Thu, 9 May 2019 15:42:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [9.80.95.107]) by d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 9 May 2019 15:42:22 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 01/12] MODSIGN: Export module signature definitions From: Mimi Zohar To: Thiago Jung Bauermann , linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 09 May 2019 11:42:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20190418035120.2354-2-bauerman@linux.ibm.com> References: <20190418035120.2354-1-bauerman@linux.ibm.com> <20190418035120.2354-2-bauerman@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5 (3.20.5-1.fc24) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19050915-0008-0000-0000-000002E4F703 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19050915-0009-0000-0000-000022517E40 Message-Id: <1557416528.10635.62.camel@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-05-09_02:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1905090090 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Herbert Xu , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Dmitry Kasatkin , "David S. Miller" , Jonathan Corbet , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, James Morris , David Howells , "AKASHI, Takahiro" , linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, Jessica Yu , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, David Woodhouse , "Serge E. Hallyn" Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Thu, 2019-04-18 at 00:51 -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: > IMA will use the module_signature format for append signatures, so export > the relevant definitions and factor out the code which verifies that the > appended signature trailer is valid. > > Also, create a CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_FORMAT option so that IMA can select it > and be able to use mod_check_sig() without having to depend on either > CONFIG_MODULE_SIG or CONFIG_MODULES. > > Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann > Cc: Jessica Yu Just a couple minor questions/comments below. Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar > --- < snip > > diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig > index 4592bf7997c0..a71019553ee1 100644 > --- a/init/Kconfig > +++ b/init/Kconfig > @@ -1906,7 +1906,7 @@ config MODULE_SRCVERSION_ALL > config MODULE_SIG > bool "Module signature verification" > depends on MODULES > - select SYSTEM_DATA_VERIFICATION > + select MODULE_SIG_FORMAT > help > Check modules for valid signatures upon load: the signature > is simply appended to the module. For more information see > @@ -2036,6 +2036,10 @@ config TRIM_UNUSED_KSYMS > > endif # MODULES > > +config MODULE_SIG_FORMAT > + def_bool n > + select SYSTEM_DATA_VERIFICATION Normally Kconfigs, in the same file, are defined before they are used. I'm not sure if that is required or just a convention. > config MODULES_TREE_LOOKUP > def_bool y > depends on PERF_EVENTS || TRACING > diff --git a/kernel/Makefile b/kernel/Makefile > index 6c57e78817da..d2f2488f80ab 100644 > --- a/kernel/Makefile > +++ b/kernel/Makefile > @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ endif > obj-$(CONFIG_UID16) += uid16.o > obj-$(CONFIG_MODULES) += module.o > obj-$(CONFIG_MODULE_SIG) += module_signing.o > +obj-$(CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_FORMAT) += module_signature.o > obj-$(CONFIG_KALLSYMS) += kallsyms.o > obj-$(CONFIG_BSD_PROCESS_ACCT) += acct.o > obj-$(CONFIG_CRASH_CORE) += crash_core.o > diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c > index 985caa467aef..326ddeb364dd 100644 > --- a/kernel/module.c > +++ b/kernel/module.c > @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > #include > #include > #include > diff --git a/kernel/module_signature.c b/kernel/module_signature.c > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..6d5e59f27f55 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/kernel/module_signature.c > @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@ > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ > +/* > + * Module signature checker > + * > + * Copyright (C) 2012 Red Hat, Inc. All Rights Reserved. > + * Written by David Howells (dhowells@redhat.com) > + */ > + > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > + > +/** > + * mod_check_sig - check that the given signature is sane > + * > + * @ms: Signature to check. > + * @file_len: Size of the file to which @ms is appended. "name" is missing. Mimi > + */