From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CF25C04AB1 for ; Thu, 9 May 2019 15:48:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE3AE2175B for ; Thu, 9 May 2019 15:48:31 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org DE3AE2175B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 450HnB13F6zDqRt for ; Fri, 10 May 2019 01:48:30 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=zohar@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 450HlB5GmSzDqRR for ; Fri, 10 May 2019 01:46:46 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098417.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x49FcTv7086107 for ; Thu, 9 May 2019 11:46:44 -0400 Received: from e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.101]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2scnjyd8j3-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 09 May 2019 11:46:42 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 9 May 2019 16:46:40 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.197) by e06smtp05.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.135) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Thu, 9 May 2019 16:46:34 +0100 Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.58]) by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x49FkX0Q36700272 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 9 May 2019 15:46:33 GMT Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 859404C04A; Thu, 9 May 2019 15:46:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A6A54C04E; Thu, 9 May 2019 15:46:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [9.80.95.107]) by d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 9 May 2019 15:46:31 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 06/12] ima: Use designated initializers for struct ima_event_data From: Mimi Zohar To: Thiago Jung Bauermann , linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 09 May 2019 11:46:20 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20190418035120.2354-7-bauerman@linux.ibm.com> References: <20190418035120.2354-1-bauerman@linux.ibm.com> <20190418035120.2354-7-bauerman@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5 (3.20.5-1.fc24) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19050915-0020-0000-0000-0000033AFAC4 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19050915-0021-0000-0000-0000218DA29E Message-Id: <1557416780.10635.66.camel@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-05-09_02:, , signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1905090090 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Herbert Xu , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Dmitry Kasatkin , "David S. Miller" , Jonathan Corbet , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, James Morris , David Howells , "AKASHI, Takahiro" , linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, Jessica Yu , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, David Woodhouse , "Serge E. Hallyn" Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Thu, 2019-04-18 at 00:51 -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: > Designated initializers allow specifying only the members of the struct > that need initialization. Non-mentioned members are initialized to zero. > > This makes the code a bit clearer (particularly in ima_add_boot_aggregate() > and also allows adding a new member to the struct without having to update > all struct initializations. > > Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann Reviewed-by:  Mimi Zohar > --- > security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c | 11 +++++++---- > security/integrity/ima/ima_init.c | 4 ++-- > 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c > index c7505fb122d4..0639d0631f2c 100644 > --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c > +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c > @@ -133,8 +133,9 @@ void ima_add_violation(struct file *file, const unsigned char *filename, > { > struct ima_template_entry *entry; > struct inode *inode = file_inode(file); > - struct ima_event_data event_data = {iint, file, filename, NULL, 0, > - cause}; > + struct ima_event_data event_data = { .iint = iint, .file = file, > + .filename = filename, > + .violation = cause }; > int violation = 1; > int result; > > @@ -284,8 +285,10 @@ void ima_store_measurement(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint, > int result = -ENOMEM; > struct inode *inode = file_inode(file); > struct ima_template_entry *entry; > - struct ima_event_data event_data = {iint, file, filename, xattr_value, > - xattr_len, NULL}; > + struct ima_event_data event_data = { .iint = iint, .file = file, > + .filename = filename, > + .xattr_value = xattr_value, > + .xattr_len = xattr_len }; > int violation = 0; > > if (iint->measured_pcrs & (0x1 << pcr)) > diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_init.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_init.c > index 6c9295449751..ef6c3a26296e 100644 > --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_init.c > +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_init.c > @@ -49,8 +49,8 @@ static int __init ima_add_boot_aggregate(void) > const char *audit_cause = "ENOMEM"; > struct ima_template_entry *entry; > struct integrity_iint_cache tmp_iint, *iint = &tmp_iint; > - struct ima_event_data event_data = {iint, NULL, boot_aggregate_name, > - NULL, 0, NULL}; > + struct ima_event_data event_data = { .iint = iint, > + .filename = boot_aggregate_name }; > int result = -ENOMEM; > int violation = 0; > struct {