From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34611C3A589 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 05:27:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64588216F4 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 05:27:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="si+u45hg" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 64588216F4 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46CK6t4tX5zDq9d for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 15:27:18 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com (client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::443; helo=mail-pf1-x443.google.com; envelope-from=npiggin@gmail.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="si+u45hg"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-pf1-x443.google.com (mail-pf1-x443.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::443]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46CK522Q9MzDqv1 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 15:25:42 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-pf1-x443.google.com with SMTP id b24so2653760pfp.1 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 22:25:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:subject:to:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent :message-id:content-transfer-encoding; bh=07F27dbHjSBFW0Vf6s8eng3hyA7KIJPp2tEKV9Na+B8=; b=si+u45hgKxelZNfJ3k7rTcsYC78FVhGEB+nqGTaGfZWE1XdbxONmhZ3wdoiGokdLej xPBvzpNdvFjHDGXSpSrOOJFb8j7S7IfzVB5JX+BrgvYq7EyW7Xgltx4oWuWGSSOI4fd1 thcVaLqCuo901VaqbEEXZK1HQE5H4imCPWF8DiatdTN5MEBtL4+701gjYeklQjDiLImj 97YlKV80PFMnRuo1DuF+OOq+k2i9qCySSvMYX67j3FQbmmzN8bFMNogNi3Z7oAlhbw9c WXVy39eoQnOcn4dW5JjFirqpMHV4aBSELkofAkvPWHiTPHPtdC7bEQGytk3dKqYKDgYN +GYA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:subject:to:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:user-agent:message-id:content-transfer-encoding; bh=07F27dbHjSBFW0Vf6s8eng3hyA7KIJPp2tEKV9Na+B8=; b=jjb1ttbrzFJ4ZOv7Dn9rWj1Q8eSHB5DeagBRmPVSPuCvsqPcj/uxDRWvxt743xyQK6 QCsI86TVlnX4I/4sySAhKEYoLsP6jv/HdPdHkOWW+hwk4KaKgFUAgijtiQ6FymB3loO1 rPn/FCiFIIzfsjopoHzDj4nHOLJOw7CqTLfojfsBMoxc4J8/q9QKSa0xBTbfKsEAKV4u rEymbKs6GnEDre6WZwUz6PykfCrQQIT8euBfIO6S8zjXzFz0b8kdVTtLX9okVAHpTf6H TmSOiLFd/FNiN2Bh31CE2rQb/VRxC1UlHKb2jClNsmbPoiDxy0UJ22kaAJz0PvfDjcD5 q/Tg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVrmxDGvTxAN/bXnYZywDJ7zt8RRY97u5j1qaT+gakd4EvH84QE Db7PReXBlwpr9Vnp9T7rgjm8Th2a X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzp0TSfwd//bEnY7J3noJ0nGbh2FfRovnzKiTocEzqsAP1DqdSqErpbBT4YCBBTP8obuAl+UQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:fe01:: with SMTP id ck1mr24235962pjb.89.1566278736580; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 22:25:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([193.114.104.176]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j20sm16416267pfr.113.2019.08.19.22.25.35 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 19 Aug 2019 22:25:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 15:25:30 +1000 From: Nicholas Piggin Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/64s: remove support for kernel-mode syscalls To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org References: <20190820051106.15744-1-npiggin@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20190820051106.15744-1-npiggin@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: astroid/0.15.0 (https://github.com/astroidmail/astroid) Message-Id: <1566278548.kqnmyauasd.astroid@bobo.none> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Nicholas Piggin's on August 20, 2019 3:11 pm: > There is support for the kernel to execute the 'sc 0' instruction and > make a system call to itself. This is a relic that is unused in the > tree, therefore untested. It's also highly questionable for modules to > be doing this. Oh I'm sorry this is not 64s, it's 64e as well, I just realised title is wrong. I actually haven't tested 64e either. Thanks, Nick =