linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] powerpc/64: syscalls in C
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 19:49:20 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1566985278.ehbnos9t6c.astroid@bobo.none> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5ecd9d1a-d35e-dc8c-9ad4-a830a8b1a952@c-s.fr>

Christophe Leroy's on August 28, 2019 7:06 pm:
> 
> 
> Le 27/08/2019 à 15:55, Nicholas Piggin a écrit :
>> Accounted for some feedback.
>> 
>> Nicholas Piggin (4):
>>    powerpc: convert to copy_thread_tls
>>    powerpc/64: remove support for kernel-mode syscalls
>>    powerpc/64: system call remove non-volatile GPR save optimisation
>>    powerpc/64: system call implement the bulk of the logic in C
> 
> Would it be possible to split in the following parts:
> 
> 1/ Implement in C whatever can be implemented without removing 
> non-volatile GPR save optimisation
> 2/ Remove non-volatile GPR save optimisation
> 3/ Implement in C everything else

Hmm. I'll have a look but I would rather not go back and add the
intermediate state I was hoping to avoid. I'll think about it and
if it's not too difficult I will try to add something. I have an
idea.

With your nvregs performance test on ppc32, are you doing the
nvgpr restore? The fast path should be able to avoid that.

Thanks,
Nick

  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-28  9:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-27 13:55 [PATCH v2 0/4] powerpc/64: syscalls in C Nicholas Piggin
2019-08-27 13:55 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] powerpc: convert to copy_thread_tls Nicholas Piggin
2019-08-27 13:55 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] powerpc/64: remove support for kernel-mode syscalls Nicholas Piggin
2019-08-27 13:55 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] powerpc/64: system call remove non-volatile GPR save optimisation Nicholas Piggin
2019-08-28  9:02   ` Christophe Leroy
2019-08-28  9:32     ` Nicholas Piggin
2019-08-27 13:55 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] powerpc/64: system call implement the bulk of the logic in C Nicholas Piggin
2019-08-28  6:51   ` Christophe Leroy
2019-08-28  9:41     ` Nicholas Piggin
2019-08-28 15:30   ` Michal Suchánek
2019-08-28 22:19     ` Nicholas Piggin
2019-08-30 18:48   ` kbuild test robot
2019-08-30 20:04     ` Michal Suchánek
2019-09-02 10:20       ` Michael Ellerman
2019-08-28  9:06 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] powerpc/64: syscalls " Christophe Leroy
2019-08-28  9:49   ` Nicholas Piggin [this message]
2019-08-28  9:55     ` Christophe Leroy
2019-08-29  9:38       ` Nicholas Piggin
2019-08-29 10:45         ` Nicholas Piggin
2019-08-29 11:51         ` Segher Boessenkool
2019-08-29 15:49           ` Nicholas Piggin
2019-08-29 22:56             ` Nicholas Piggin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1566985278.ehbnos9t6c.astroid@bobo.none \
    --to=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@c-s.fr \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).