From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Mackerras MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-ID: <15700.52122.899541.683630@argo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2002 18:15:22 +1000 (EST) To: akuster@dslextreme.com Cc: David Gibson , linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: First steps to OCP device model integration In-Reply-To: <3D541AE9.40007@dslextreme.com> References: <20020809042605.GC23642@zax> <3D541AE9.40007@dslextreme.com> Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: akuster writes: > I object seriously. > > Some of what you have might be useful.:) OCP is not just for 4xx. In > fact the name may need to change. I have been working on overhalling > this interface and testing the ideas before having a review of the > changes. I am on the hook to Paul and others to get this out in the > open to discuss and am not ready. So if you could just relax and wait I > would appriciate it. I would rather see the 2.5 kernel boot on a few > 4xx boards Two points: - Integrating the OCP stuff into the unified device model (driverfs etc.) in 2.5 is essential. - I really want to have some open discussions about ideas, structures etc. for OCP support *before* you have everything fully worked out. :) Regards, Paul. ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/