From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 434F3C43603 for ; Mon, 9 Dec 2019 21:39:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3437205C9 for ; Mon, 9 Dec 2019 21:39:15 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org F3437205C9 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47WxR46WLzzDqNy for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 08:39:12 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from ozlabs.org (bilbo.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47WxP22qHyzDqMd for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 08:37:26 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Received: from ozlabs.org (bilbo.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::2]) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47WxP21tW6z8sZq for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 08:37:26 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by ozlabs.org (Postfix) id 47WxP21KTyz9sPK; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 08:37:26 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=zohar@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47WxP14DBvz9sP3 for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 08:37:25 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098396.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id xB9LbMho081246 for ; Mon, 9 Dec 2019 16:37:23 -0500 Received: from e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.97]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2wskna2qc4-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 09 Dec 2019 16:37:23 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 9 Dec 2019 21:37:04 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.197) by e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.131) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Mon, 9 Dec 2019 21:37:00 -0000 Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.60]) by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id xB9Lawl152625544 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 9 Dec 2019 21:36:58 GMT Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9511A42042; Mon, 9 Dec 2019 21:36:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D2784203F; Mon, 9 Dec 2019 21:36:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dhcp-9-31-102-17.watson.ibm.com (unknown [9.31.102.17]) by d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 9 Dec 2019 21:36:57 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/9] powerpc: Enabling IMA arch specific secure boot policies From: Mimi Zohar To: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2019 16:36:56 -0500 In-Reply-To: <5254346f-4ba7-c820-e127-d46b84f2e6e6@linux.microsoft.com> References: <1572492694-6520-1-git-send-email-zohar@linux.ibm.com> <5254346f-4ba7-c820-e127-d46b84f2e6e6@linux.microsoft.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5 (3.20.5-1.fc24) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19120921-4275-0000-0000-0000038D66CB X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19120921-4276-0000-0000-000038A115A8 Message-Id: <1575927416.4557.25.camel@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.95,18.0.572 definitions=2019-12-09_04:2019-12-09,2019-12-09 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxscore=0 phishscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=928 spamscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 clxscore=1015 priorityscore=1501 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1910280000 definitions=main-1912090170 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Ard Biesheuvel , Eric Ricther , Nayna Jain , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras , Jeremy Kerr , Oliver O'Halloran Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Mon, 2019-12-09 at 12:27 -0800, Lakshmi Ramasubramanian wrote: > Hi Mimi, > > On 10/30/2019 8:31 PM, Mimi Zohar wrote: > > > This patchset extends the previous version[1] by adding support for > > checking against a blacklist of binary hashes. > > > > The IMA subsystem supports custom, built-in, arch-specific policies to > > define the files to be measured and appraised. These policies are honored > > based on priority, where arch-specific policy is the highest and custom > > is the lowest. > > Has this change been signed off and merged for the next update of the > kernel (v5.5)? Yes, refer to the linuxppc mailing list archives. Mimi [1] https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/