From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D231C2D0C0 for ; Sun, 22 Dec 2019 11:29:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB7BC20663 for ; Sun, 22 Dec 2019 11:29:45 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org EB7BC20663 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47ggHq4zHtzDqHW for ; Sun, 22 Dec 2019 22:29:43 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=haren@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47gg2c6h43zDqGY for ; Sun, 22 Dec 2019 22:18:16 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098416.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id xBMBHR7o113467; Sun, 22 Dec 2019 06:18:05 -0500 Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2x21kx7ngq-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 22 Dec 2019 06:18:05 -0500 Received: from m0098416.ppops.net (m0098416.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.36/8.16.0.36) with SMTP id xBMBI5C6114678; Sun, 22 Dec 2019 06:18:05 -0500 Received: from ppma05wdc.us.ibm.com (1b.90.2fa9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.47.144.27]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2x21kx7ng7-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 22 Dec 2019 06:18:05 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma05wdc.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma05wdc.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id xBMBF6mw003349; Sun, 22 Dec 2019 11:18:04 GMT Received: from b01cxnp23033.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp23033.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.28]) by ppma05wdc.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 2x1b16209q-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 22 Dec 2019 11:18:04 +0000 Received: from b01ledav006.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav006.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.111]) by b01cxnp23033.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id xBMBI4vc21627370 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Sun, 22 Dec 2019 11:18:04 GMT Received: from b01ledav006.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EC1AAC059; Sun, 22 Dec 2019 11:18:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav006.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3C32AC05B; Sun, 22 Dec 2019 11:18:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.70.82.143] (unknown [9.70.82.143]) by b01ledav006.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 Dec 2019 11:18:03 +0000 (GMT) Subject: [PATCH V4 09/14] powerpc/vas: Update CSB and notify process for fault CRBs From: Haren Myneni To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org In-Reply-To: <1577012478.12797.71.camel@hbabu-laptop> References: <1577012478.12797.71.camel@hbabu-laptop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2019 03:17:55 -0800 Message-ID: <1577013475.12797.85.camel@hbabu-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.95,18.0.572 definitions=2019-12-22_01:2019-12-17,2019-12-21 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 mlxlogscore=776 impostorscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 malwarescore=0 priorityscore=1501 adultscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 phishscore=0 suspectscore=1 clxscore=1015 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1910280000 definitions=main-1912220105 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: mikey@neuling.org, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, npiggin@gmail.com, hch@infradead.org, oohall@gmail.com, sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" For each fault CRB, update fault address in CRB (fault_storage_addr) and translation error status in CSB so that user space can touch the fault address and resend the request. If the user space passed invalid CSB address send signal to process with SIGSEGV. Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu Signed-off-by: Haren Myneni --- arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/vas-fault.c | 120 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 120 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/vas-fault.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/vas-fault.c index 5c2cada..1d31d8d 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/vas-fault.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/vas-fault.c @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include @@ -26,6 +27,124 @@ #define VAS_FAULT_WIN_FIFO_SIZE (4 << 20) /* + * Update the CSB to indicate a translation error. + * + * If the fault is in the CSB address itself or if we are unable to + * update the CSB, send a signal to the process, because we have no + * other way of notifying the user process. + * + * Remaining settings in the CSB are based on wait_for_csb() of + * NX-GZIP. + */ +static void update_csb(struct vas_window *window, + struct coprocessor_request_block *crb) +{ + int rc; + struct pid *pid; + void __user *csb_addr; + struct task_struct *tsk; + struct kernel_siginfo info; + struct coprocessor_status_block csb; + + /* + * NX user space windows can not be opened for task->mm=NULL + * and faults will not be generated for kernel requests. + */ + if (!window->mm || !window->user_win) + return; + + csb_addr = (void *)be64_to_cpu(crb->csb_addr); + + csb.cc = CSB_CC_TRANSLATION; + csb.ce = CSB_CE_TERMINATION; + csb.cs = 0; + csb.count = 0; + + /* + * Returns the fault address in CPU format since it is passed with + * signal. But if the user space expects BE format, need changes. + * i.e either kernel (here) or user should convert to CPU format. + * Not both! + */ + csb.address = be64_to_cpu(crb->stamp.nx.fault_storage_addr); + csb.flags = 0; + + use_mm(window->mm); + rc = copy_to_user(csb_addr, &csb, sizeof(csb)); + /* + * User space polls on csb.flags (first byte). So add barrier + * then copy first byte with csb flags update. + */ + smp_mb(); + if (!rc) { + csb.flags = CSB_V; + rc = copy_to_user(csb_addr, &csb, sizeof(u8)); + } + unuse_mm(window->mm); + + /* Success */ + if (!rc) + return; + + /* + * User space passed invalid CSB address, Notify process with + * SEGV signal. + */ + pid = window->pid; + tsk = get_pid_task(pid, PIDTYPE_PID); + /* + * Send window will be closed after processing all NX requests + * and process exits after closing all windows. In multi-thread + * applications, thread may not exists, but does not close FD + * (means send window) upon exit. Parent thread (tgid) can use + * and close the window later. + * pid and mm references are taken when window is opened by + * process (pid). So tgid is used only when child thread opens + * a window and exits without closing it in multithread tasks. + */ + if (!tsk) { + pid = window->tgid; + tsk = get_pid_task(pid, PIDTYPE_PID); + /* + * Parent thread will be closing window during its exit. + * So should not get here. + */ + if (!tsk) + return; + } + + /* Do not notify if the task is exiting. */ + if (tsk->flags & PF_EXITING) { + put_task_struct(tsk); + return; + } + put_task_struct(tsk); + + pr_err("Invalid CSB address 0x%p signalling pid(%d)\n", + csb_addr, pid_vnr(pid)); + + clear_siginfo(&info); + info.si_signo = SIGSEGV; + info.si_errno = EFAULT; + info.si_code = SEGV_MAPERR; + info.si_addr = csb_addr; + + /* + * process will be polling on csb.flags after request is sent to + * NX. So generally CSB update should not fail except when an + * application does not follow the process properly. So an error + * message will be displayed and leave it to user space whether + * to ignore or handle this signal. + */ + rcu_read_lock(); + rc = kill_pid_info(SIGSEGV, &info, pid); + rcu_read_unlock(); + + pr_devel("%s(): pid %d kill_proc_info() rc %d\n", __func__, + pid_vnr(pid), rc); +} + +/* * Process CRBs that we receive on the fault window. */ irqreturn_t vas_fault_handler(int irq, void *data) @@ -104,6 +223,7 @@ irqreturn_t vas_fault_handler(int irq, void *data) return IRQ_HANDLED; } + update_csb(window, crb); } while (true); return IRQ_HANDLED; -- 1.8.3.1