linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/64: BE option to use ELFv2 ABI for big endian kernels
Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2020 10:58:54 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1583542596.l37hgse8mc.astroid@bobo.none> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200305105503.GZ22482@gate.crashing.org>

Segher Boessenkool's on March 5, 2020 8:55 pm:
> On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 01:34:22PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
>> Segher Boessenkool's on March 4, 2020 9:09 am:
>> >> +override flavour := linux-ppc64v2
>> > 
>> > That isn't a good name, heh.  This isn't "v2" of anything...  Spell out
>> > the name "ELFv2"?  Or as "elfv2"?  It is just a name after all, it is
>> > version 1 in all three version fields in the ELF headers!
>> 
>> Yeah okay. This part is only for some weird little perl asm generator
>> script, but probably better to be careful. linux-ppc64-elfv2 ?
> 
> That generator is from openssl, or inspired by it, it is everywhere.
> So it is more important to get it right than it would seem at first
> glance ;-)
> 
> That name looks perfect to me.  You'll have to update REs expecting the
> arch at the end (like /le$/), but you had to already I think?

le$ is still okay for testing ppc64le, unless you wanted me to add the 
-elfv2 suffix on there as well? If that was the case, for consistency
we'd also have to add -elfv1 for the BE v1 case. I was just going to add
-elfv2 for the new variant.

Thanks,
Nick

  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-07  1:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-03  1:45 [PATCH] powerpc/64: BE option to use ELFv2 ABI for big endian kernels Nicholas Piggin
2020-03-03 23:09 ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-03-05  3:34   ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-03-05 10:55     ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-03-07  0:58       ` Nicholas Piggin [this message]
2020-03-09 21:48         ` Segher Boessenkool

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1583542596.l37hgse8mc.astroid@bobo.none \
    --to=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).