From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/64: ftrace don't trace real mode
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2020 16:32:55 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1584759479.7ueu8qvhgs.astroid@bobo.none> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1584728788.91gvyrzbi3.naveen@linux.ibm.com>
Naveen N. Rao's on March 21, 2020 4:39 am:
> Hi Nick,
>
> Nicholas Piggin wrote:
>> This warns and prevents tracing attempted in a real-mode context.
>
> Is this something you're seeing often? Last time we looked at this, KVM
> was the biggest offender and we introduced paca->ftrace_enabled as a way
> to disable ftrace while in KVM code.
Not often but it has a tendancy to blow up the least tested code at the
worst times :)
Machine check is bad, I'm sure HMI too but I haven't tested that yet.
I've fixed up most of it with annotations, this is obviously an extra
safety not something to rely on like ftrace_enabled. Probably even the
WARN_ON here is dangerous here, but I don't want to leave these bugs
in there.
Although the machine check and hmi code touch a fair bit of stuff and
annotating is a bit fragile. It might actually be better if the
paca->ftrace_enabled could be a nesting counter, then we could use it
in machine checks too and avoid a lot of annotations.
> While this is cheap when handling ftrace_regs_caller() as done in this
> patch, for simple function tracing (see below), we will have to grab the
> MSR which will slow things down slightly.
mfmsr is not too bad these days.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 3 +++
>> .../powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace_64_mprofile.S | 19 +++++++++++++++----
>> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
>> index 7ea0ca044b65..ef965815fcb9 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
>> @@ -949,6 +949,9 @@ unsigned long prepare_ftrace_return(unsigned long parent, unsigned long ip,
>> {
>> unsigned long return_hooker;
>>
>> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE((mfmsr() & (MSR_IR|MSR_DR)) != (MSR_IR|MSR_DR)))
>> + goto out;
>> +
>
> This is called on function entry to redirect function return to a
> trampoline if needed. I am not sure if we have (or will have) too many C
> functions that disable MSR_IR|MSR_DR. Unless the number of such
> functions is large, it might be preferable to mark specific functions as
> notrace.
>
>> if (unlikely(ftrace_graph_is_dead()))
>> goto out;
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace_64_mprofile.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace_64_mprofile.S
>> index f9fd5f743eba..6205f15cb603 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace_64_mprofile.S
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace_64_mprofile.S
>> @@ -51,16 +51,21 @@ _GLOBAL(ftrace_regs_caller)
>> SAVE_10GPRS(12, r1)
>> SAVE_10GPRS(22, r1)
>>
>> - /* Save previous stack pointer (r1) */
>> - addi r8, r1, SWITCH_FRAME_SIZE
>> - std r8, GPR1(r1)
>> -
>> /* Load special regs for save below */
>> mfmsr r8
>> mfctr r9
>> mfxer r10
>> mfcr r11
>>
>> + /* Shouldn't be called in real mode */
>> + andi. r3,r8,(MSR_IR|MSR_DR)
>> + cmpdi r3,(MSR_IR|MSR_DR)
>> + bne ftrace_bad_realmode
>> +
>> + /* Save previous stack pointer (r1) */
>> + addi r8, r1, SWITCH_FRAME_SIZE
>> + std r8, GPR1(r1)
>> +
>
> This stomps on the MSR value in r8, which is saved into pt_regs further
> below.
>
> You'll also have to handle ftrace_caller() which is used for simple
> function tracing. We don't read the MSR there today, but that will be
> needed if we want to suppress tracing.
Oops, thanks good catch.
Thanks,
Nick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-21 6:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-20 15:25 [PATCH] powerpc/64: ftrace don't trace real mode Nicholas Piggin
2020-03-20 18:39 ` Naveen N. Rao
2020-03-21 6:32 ` Nicholas Piggin [this message]
2020-03-22 16:17 ` Naveen N. Rao
2020-03-23 4:10 ` Nicholas Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1584759479.7ueu8qvhgs.astroid@bobo.none \
--to=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).