From: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Balamuruhan S <bala24@linux.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com, jniethe5@gmail.com,
paulus@samba.org, sandipan@linux.ibm.com,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 7/7] powerpc/selftest: reuse ppc-opcode macros to avoid redundancy
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 19:47:30 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1588169193.tsmipo5v6k.naveen@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87k11yfvxu.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au>
Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Balamuruhan S <bala24@linux.ibm.com> writes:
>> Avoid redefining macros to encode ppc instructions instead reuse it from
>> ppc-opcode.h, Makefile changes are necessary to compile memcmp_64.S with
>> __ASSEMBLY__ defined from selftests.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Balamuruhan S <bala24@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> .../selftests/powerpc/stringloops/Makefile | 34 ++++++++++++++----
>> .../powerpc/stringloops/asm/asm-const.h | 1 +
>> .../powerpc/stringloops/asm/ppc-opcode.h | 36 +------------------
>> 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
>> create mode 120000 tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/stringloops/asm/asm-const.h
>> mode change 100644 => 120000 tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/stringloops/asm/ppc-opcode.h
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/stringloops/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/stringloops/Makefile
>> index 7fc0623d85c3..efe76c5a5b94 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/stringloops/Makefile
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/stringloops/Makefile
>> @@ -1,26 +1,44 @@
>> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> # The loops are all 64-bit code
>> -CFLAGS += -I$(CURDIR)
>> +GIT_VERSION = $(shell git describe --always --long --dirty || echo "unknown")
>> +CFLAGS += -DGIT_VERSION='"$(GIT_VERSION)"' -I$(CURDIR) -I$(CURDIR)/../include
>>
>> EXTRA_SOURCES := ../harness.c
>>
>> build_32bit = $(shell if ($(CC) $(CFLAGS) -m32 -o /dev/null memcmp.c >/dev/null 2>&1) then echo "1"; fi)
>>
>> +ifneq ($(build_32bit),1)
>> TEST_GEN_PROGS := memcmp_64 strlen
>> +TEST_GEN_FILES := memcmp.o memcmp_64.o memcmp_64
>> +MEMCMP := $(OUTPUT)/memcmp.o
>> +MEMCMP_64 := $(OUTPUT)/memcmp_64.o
>> +HARNESS := $(OUTPUT)/../harness.o
>> +CFLAGS += -m64 -maltivec
>>
>> -$(OUTPUT)/memcmp_64: memcmp.c
>> -$(OUTPUT)/memcmp_64: CFLAGS += -m64 -maltivec
>> +OVERRIDE_TARGETS := 1
>> +include ../../lib.mk
>>
>> -ifeq ($(build_32bit),1)
>> +$(OUTPUT)/memcmp_64: $(MEMCMP_64) $(MEMCMP) $(HARNESS)
>> + $(CC) $(CFLAGS) memcmp.o memcmp_64.o ../harness.o -o memcmp_64
>> +
>> +$(MEMCMP_64): memcmp_64.S
>> + $(CC) $(CFLAGS) -D__ASSEMBLY__ -o memcmp_64.o -c memcmp_64.S
>> +
>> +$(MEMCMP): memcmp.c
>> + $(CC) $(CFLAGS) -o memcmp.o -c memcmp.c
>> +
>> +$(HARNESS): $(EXTRA_SOURCES)
>> + $(CC) $(CFLAGS) -DGIT_VERSION='"$(GIT_VERSION)"' -o ../harness.o -c $(EXTRA_SOURCES)
>
> What are you actually trying to do here? Is it just that you need to
> define __ASSEMBLY__ for memcmp_64.S?
Adding __ASSEMBLY__ while building memcmp_64.S would be the goal, so as
to reuse ppc-opcode.h. However, asm/ppc-opcode.h under stringloops test
is tiny and doesn't seem to justify the change.
>
> What you have breaks the build, it's not respecting $(OUTPUT).
I think we should just drop this patch from the series.
Bala,
Can you re-post this series without the RFC tag, with the last patch
dropped?
- Naveen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-29 14:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-24 7:08 [RFC PATCH v2 0/7] consolidate PowerPC instruction encoding macros Balamuruhan S
2020-04-24 7:08 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/7] powerpc/ppc-opcode: introduce PPC_RAW_* macros for base instruction encoding Balamuruhan S
2020-04-24 7:08 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/7] powerpc/ppc-opcode: move ppc instruction encoding from test_emulate_step Balamuruhan S
2020-04-24 7:08 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/7] powerpc/bpf_jit: reuse instruction macros from ppc-opcode.h Balamuruhan S
2020-04-24 7:08 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/7] powerpc/ppc-opcode: consolidate powerpc instructions from bpf_jit.h Balamuruhan S
2020-04-28 16:19 ` Naveen N. Rao
2020-04-24 7:08 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/7] powerpc/ppc-opcode: reuse raw instruction macros to stringify Balamuruhan S
2020-04-24 7:08 ` [RFC PATCH v2 6/7] powerpc/ppc-opcode: fold PPC_INST_* macros into PPC_RAW_* macros Balamuruhan S
2020-04-24 7:08 ` [RFC PATCH v2 7/7] powerpc/selftest: reuse ppc-opcode macros to avoid redundancy Balamuruhan S
2020-04-28 16:14 ` Naveen N. Rao
2020-04-29 10:06 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-04-29 14:17 ` Naveen N. Rao [this message]
2020-04-30 2:41 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-04-30 11:57 ` Naveen N. Rao
2020-05-26 7:45 ` Balamuruhan S
2020-04-28 16:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/7] consolidate PowerPC instruction encoding macros Naveen N. Rao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1588169193.tsmipo5v6k.naveen@linux.ibm.com \
--to=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=bala24@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jniethe5@gmail.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=sandipan@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).