From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA58CC47254 for ; Sat, 9 May 2020 07:50:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DECF7207DD for ; Sat, 9 May 2020 07:50:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="uWMG0rGf" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org DECF7207DD Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49Jzr81FVSzDrBx for ; Sat, 9 May 2020 17:50:00 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com (client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::444; helo=mail-pf1-x444.google.com; envelope-from=npiggin@gmail.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20161025 header.b=uWMG0rGf; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-pf1-x444.google.com (mail-pf1-x444.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::444]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49JzpJ1RhFzDqdS for ; Sat, 9 May 2020 17:48:23 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-pf1-x444.google.com with SMTP id 145so2176545pfw.13 for ; Sat, 09 May 2020 00:48:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:subject:to:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:message-id :content-transfer-encoding; bh=XnVJoQLjqBDyQA1aedelioNyhMhbLjV3DWfxQPP3LJQ=; b=uWMG0rGf4W2OPrbNLmJKU+h47GbEaHP5WpnOH6nXIY/RvGeFIdc6+i45LapP5EJYw/ DUwZqvT6hgT2nvux7NZ8smlTTfev7wIpsWcrZOvpnKfNfmw+KrOX99tyTZaNdGmtVW67 1wQBY/4S46F+2pIZX2xLBOEtfJc61zHAbSkExU2Ky8o7WKAr0aJwBM/Au0gswS7SoBy1 z9kiwiJBxxlzXVtEGKQVIp4DBsajBbdFtB+Mx8M6OjAELLf5EdT3v7SRpbdw3pK1nUeK /zhyLp6YNxVowBIBRHps2LJvi5+FFchWhh7RxiLwg2rbinqKD+TfQIYXT2jl629phh+9 Ez0Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:subject:to:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:message-id:content-transfer-encoding; bh=XnVJoQLjqBDyQA1aedelioNyhMhbLjV3DWfxQPP3LJQ=; b=bmplIiRYX1eeVXPLM7UgvpvO3mDVD+0pVWVLnglbc1s0S23bUdsqu8EEfGcLRg/I1E cmSEItL735B9ILg/p1dJIwdUEgrkYeisA6XETmPBuYADDKWtLAX5kX/BL8IH9Ar5IhR8 3waEzWX4lBN8dL9RLo5hy9QPo93d0cDZ79Z65IOzxxC8KC1T68FIdNZ4Unt9LzUaGuRY wFrEynxq63qjkq3i7vBVbRnVS0vzlgurT0iJtTIABnOu1qaLT+DjSjZL7muJ/Dz6yxe7 ViVnIBtQexCOci6Z4kn2qzne3yr0B2iOstTsPfldYuwx8xPG1tIkDJb3WaU5gLhewXP9 Hcmg== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuYzJcLiEUS1BQWNFmbU5p0IdoYDtrJJIiRrm7dcjDvcBwdKzbAF y6p4YaPcDJ2qOdab/49i3G3X6Uh/ X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypLpd6yqp+YEsx6kVMcy98VSARzOjzr7fYrA4Hsl4wp2V6iyr1toS3IkWtssxCdtePwb9/EZKw== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:85c4:: with SMTP id z4mr7211491pfn.199.1589010500762; Sat, 09 May 2020 00:48:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (61-68-214-199.tpgi.com.au. [61.68.214.199]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v64sm3894419pfb.20.2020.05.09.00.48.18 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 09 May 2020 00:48:19 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 09 May 2020 17:48:08 +1000 From: Nicholas Piggin Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 04/16] powerpc/64s/exceptions: machine check reconcile irq state To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Michael Ellerman References: <20200508043408.886394-1-npiggin@gmail.com> <20200508043408.886394-5-npiggin@gmail.com> <878si2czrc.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> In-Reply-To: <878si2czrc.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <1589010414.5tkveztwwh.astroid@bobo.none> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Excerpts from Michael Ellerman's message of May 8, 2020 11:39 pm: > Nicholas Piggin writes: >=20 >> pseries fwnmi machine check code pops the soft-irq checks in rtas_call >> (after the previous patch to remove rtas_token from this call path). > ^ > I changed this to "next" which I think is what you meant? Yes I rearranged them, so yes. Thanks, Nick