From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B978AC433DF for ; Mon, 25 May 2020 15:10:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A0D92073B for ; Mon, 25 May 2020 15:10:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Vt8IWFBM" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6A0D92073B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49W0rx4PYTzDqQF for ; Tue, 26 May 2020 01:10:25 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org (client-ip=198.145.29.99; helo=mail.kernel.org; envelope-from=broonie@kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=Vt8IWFBM; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49W0Yx1phVzDqDr for ; Tue, 26 May 2020 00:57:25 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost (fw-tnat.cambridge.arm.com [217.140.96.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7B3CD20890; Mon, 25 May 2020 14:57:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1590418643; bh=xv7x59AoctvLsjyArJKKMotK6vJa0TElIvyKjP6jGP4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From; b=Vt8IWFBMCLjX7YmfudACYHN6YkW0RjJpqgJvENaS7c5aEw29p6ZZk3RbUWC5/sUTM W0kL4PGYN3Yfjsa1p+kOX3PLGuw6Berq1xpEYkBhnH32um3c5Js0Xnp3yNsa9NDPw9 S+yCeM8jYheAPvYy/g539gCH+E2VbaJCsC4CL+GQ= Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 15:57:20 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Xiubo.Lee@gmail.com, lgirdwood@gmail.com, Tang Bin , festevam@gmail.com, timur@kernel.org, perex@perex.cz, nicoleotsuka@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <20200513111408.11452-1-tangbin@cmss.chinamobile.com> References: <20200513111408.11452-1-tangbin@cmss.chinamobile.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl: imx-audmix: Fix unused assignment to variable 'ret' Message-Id: <159041861697.1370.3156349238499561936.b4-ty@kernel.org> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Zhang Shengju Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Wed, 13 May 2020 19:14:08 +0800, Tang Bin wrote: > Omit unused initialized value, because 'ret' will be assigined > by the function snd_soc_component_read(). Applied to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next Thanks! [1/1] ASoC: fsl: imx-audmix: Fix unused assignment to variable 'ret' commit: 085c02d355ac585184ef4f00eb333cd86f6add80 All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted. You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed. If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced. Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail. Thanks, Mark