From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, "Anton Blanchard" <anton@linux.ibm.com>,
"Cédric Le Goater" <clg@kaod.org>,
kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
"David Gibson" <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] powerpc: inline doorbell sending functions
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 11:58:30 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1593482195.vpy5eylip3.astroid@bobo.none> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87zh8l7318.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au>
Excerpts from Michael Ellerman's message of June 30, 2020 11:31 am:
> kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> writes:
>> Hi Nicholas,
>>
>> I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
>>
>> [auto build test ERROR on powerpc/next]
>> [also build test ERROR on scottwood/next v5.8-rc2 next-20200626]
>> [cannot apply to kvm-ppc/kvm-ppc-next]
>> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
>> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use as documented in
>> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
>>
>> url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Nicholas-Piggin/powerpc-pseries-IPI-doorbell-improvements/20200627-230544
>> base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux.git next
>> config: powerpc-randconfig-c003-20200628 (attached as .config)
>> compiler: powerpc64-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0
>
>> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>>
>> All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>>
>> In file included from arch/powerpc/kernel/asm-offsets.c:38:
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/dbell.h: In function 'doorbell_global_ipi':
>>>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/dbell.h:114:12: error: implicit declaration of function 'get_hard_smp_processor_id'; did you mean 'raw_smp_processor_id'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>> 114 | u32 tag = get_hard_smp_processor_id(cpu);
>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> | raw_smp_processor_id
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/dbell.h: In function 'doorbell_try_core_ipi':
>>>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/dbell.h:146:28: error: implicit declaration of function 'cpu_sibling_mask'; did you mean 'cpu_online_mask'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>> 146 | if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, cpu_sibling_mask(this_cpu))) {
>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> | cpu_online_mask
>>>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/dbell.h:146:28: warning: passing argument 2 of 'cpumask_test_cpu' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
>> 146 | if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, cpu_sibling_mask(this_cpu))) {
>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Seems like CONFIG_SMP=n is probably the root cause.
>
> You could try including asm/smp.h, but good chance that will lead to
> header soup.
Possibly. dbell.h shouldn't be included by much, but maybe it gets
dragged in.
>
> Other option would be to wrap the whole lot in #ifdef CONFIG_SMP?
Yeah that might be a better idea.
I'll fix it up and repost if there's no strong objections to
the KVM detection bit.
Thanks,
Nick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-30 2:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-27 15:04 [PATCH 0/3] powerpc/pseries: IPI doorbell improvements Nicholas Piggin
2020-06-27 15:04 ` [PATCH 1/3] powerpc: inline doorbell sending functions Nicholas Piggin
2020-06-27 19:46 ` kernel test robot
2020-06-30 1:31 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-06-30 1:58 ` Nicholas Piggin [this message]
2020-06-27 15:04 ` [PATCH 2/3] powerpc/pseries: Use doorbells even if XIVE is available Nicholas Piggin
2020-06-27 15:04 ` [PATCH 3/3] powerpc/pseries: Add KVM guest doorbell restrictions Nicholas Piggin
2020-06-30 2:27 ` Paul Mackerras
2020-06-30 5:35 ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-06-30 8:26 ` Paul Mackerras
2020-06-30 11:57 ` Nicholas Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1593482195.vpy5eylip3.astroid@bobo.none \
--to=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=anton@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=clg@kaod.org \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
--cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).