From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C421C4727E for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 20:49:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 372C920838 for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 20:49:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="pCkDikzI" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 372C920838 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BykY217glzDqjk for ; Sat, 26 Sep 2020 06:49:10 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org (client-ip=198.145.29.99; helo=mail.kernel.org; envelope-from=broonie@kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=pCkDikzI; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BykPK12l9zDqgj for ; Sat, 26 Sep 2020 06:42:29 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost (fw-tnat.cambridge.arm.com [217.140.96.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0D35B2086A; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 20:42:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1601066546; bh=nepMzFSaNIWGuxvkPkhRS9U2GlxbM0iL0eqO6N+HKLo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From; b=pCkDikzIhtdTP4bvGUomx/0wLSWLHpejHeU9wZDVmmVFwi0x5oGbLBVcwGk0iMpVt ku0xZbRNup/A5AmlFXRsv1WQeAfr4A6qsYh6qFxXNunPENqlaT+VuoRFcZS/fgwNO8 /lYvczd0vvSyHDN9i0YSPq6ulBXZbN/sTGkqYtuY= Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 21:41:31 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: lgirdwood@gmail.com, tiwai@suse.com, festevam@gmail.com, nicoleotsuka@gmail.com, Xiubo.Lee@gmail.com, Shengjiu Wang , perex@perex.cz, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, timur@kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1600424760-32071-1-git-send-email-shengjiu.wang@nxp.com> References: <1600424760-32071-1-git-send-email-shengjiu.wang@nxp.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl_sai: Instantiate snd_soc_dai_driver Message-Id: <160106647646.2866.2202767097591123725.b4-ty@kernel.org> X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 18:26:00 +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote: > Instantiate snd_soc_dai_driver for independent symmetric control. > Otherwise the symmetric setting may be overwritten by other > instance. Applied to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next Thanks! [1/1] ASoC: fsl_sai: Instantiate snd_soc_dai_driver commit: 22a16145af824f91014d07f8664114859900b9e6 All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted. You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed. If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced. Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail. Thanks, Mark