From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19451C4727E for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 22:51:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D0BD20739 for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 22:51:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="cI9xx8yz" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6D0BD20739 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C2Sz66WDrzDqdb for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 08:51:14 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org (client-ip=198.145.29.99; helo=mail.kernel.org; envelope-from=broonie@kernel.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=cI9xx8yz; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C2Std2wJHzDqb9 for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 08:47:21 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost (fw-tnat.cambridge.arm.com [217.140.96.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 13E772074B; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 22:47:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1601592439; bh=Nw0bQWyAnCws4gXfnM3e/umkSOc68t+yKD9KWMksTaM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From; b=cI9xx8yzuCkVJClCAlKB3q8snrQNK03n71jWh4k5blrpkfEtjhRDrkhbry21yQGPl qEKUEGMqJ70lLE66uIHWVeABc+LW6knNFv3/WxncMjrH+MSQ7sNGv1HAG58hyOoQfJ HDVPadMg6MqPRhqKb6Qy8Ckbr+QSnKL6ce9DuIQY= Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2020 23:46:20 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: timur@kernel.org, lgirdwood@gmail.com, Tang Bin , perex@perex.cz, tiwai@suse.com In-Reply-To: <20200826150918.16116-1-tangbin@cmss.chinamobile.com> References: <20200826150918.16116-1-tangbin@cmss.chinamobile.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl_spdif: Fix unnecessary check in fsl_spdif_probe() Message-Id: <160159237545.44588.9742249781960285327.b4-ty@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Zhang Shengju , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Wed, 26 Aug 2020 23:09:18 +0800, Tang Bin wrote: > The function fsl_spdif_probe() is only called with an openfirmware > platform device. Therefore there is no need to check that the passed > in device is NULL. Applied to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next Thanks! [1/1] ASoC: fsl_spdif: Fix unnecessary check in fsl_spdif_probe() commit: 601fd3a7d849cf8a5dbd3628b3c29af9e5377961 All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted. You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed. If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced. Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail. Thanks, Mark