linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Falcon <tlfalcon@linux.ibm.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: cforno12@linux.ibm.com, ljp@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	ricklind@linux.ibm.com, dnbanerg@us.ibm.com,
	tlfalcon@linux.ibm.com, drt@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com, sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next 09/12] ibmvnic: Ensure that device queue memory is cache-line aligned
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 13:10:04 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1605208207-1896-10-git-send-email-tlfalcon@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1605208207-1896-1-git-send-email-tlfalcon@linux.ibm.com>

From: "Dwip N. Banerjee" <dnbanerg@us.ibm.com>

PCI bus slowdowns were observed on IBM VNIC devices as a result
of partial cache line writes and non-cache aligned full cache line writes.
Ensure that packet data buffers are cache-line aligned to avoid these
slowdowns.

Signed-off-by: Dwip N. Banerjee <dnbanerg@us.ibm.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c |  9 ++++++---
 drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.h | 10 +++++-----
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
index b2ca34e94078..dc42bdc6d3e1 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
@@ -498,7 +498,7 @@ static int reset_rx_pools(struct ibmvnic_adapter *adapter)
 
 		if (rx_pool->buff_size != buff_size) {
 			free_long_term_buff(adapter, &rx_pool->long_term_buff);
-			rx_pool->buff_size = buff_size;
+			rx_pool->buff_size = ALIGN(buff_size, L1_CACHE_BYTES);
 			rc = alloc_long_term_buff(adapter,
 						  &rx_pool->long_term_buff,
 						  rx_pool->size *
@@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ static int init_rx_pools(struct net_device *netdev)
 
 		rx_pool->size = adapter->req_rx_add_entries_per_subcrq;
 		rx_pool->index = i;
-		rx_pool->buff_size = buff_size;
+		rx_pool->buff_size = ALIGN(buff_size, L1_CACHE_BYTES);
 		rx_pool->active = 1;
 
 		rx_pool->free_map = kcalloc(rx_pool->size, sizeof(int),
@@ -745,6 +745,7 @@ static int init_tx_pools(struct net_device *netdev)
 {
 	struct ibmvnic_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
 	int tx_subcrqs;
+	u64 buff_size;
 	int i, rc;
 
 	tx_subcrqs = adapter->num_active_tx_scrqs;
@@ -761,9 +762,11 @@ static int init_tx_pools(struct net_device *netdev)
 	adapter->num_active_tx_pools = tx_subcrqs;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < tx_subcrqs; i++) {
+		buff_size = adapter->req_mtu + VLAN_HLEN;
+		buff_size = ALIGN(buff_size, L1_CACHE_BYTES);
 		rc = init_one_tx_pool(netdev, &adapter->tx_pool[i],
 				      adapter->req_tx_entries_per_subcrq,
-				      adapter->req_mtu + VLAN_HLEN);
+				      buff_size);
 		if (rc) {
 			release_tx_pools(adapter);
 			return rc;
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.h
index c6f1842d2023..1e4c7702402b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.h
@@ -884,7 +884,7 @@ struct ibmvnic_sub_crq_queue {
 	atomic_t used;
 	char name[32];
 	u64 handle;
-};
+} ____cacheline_aligned;
 
 struct ibmvnic_long_term_buff {
 	unsigned char *buff;
@@ -908,7 +908,7 @@ struct ibmvnic_tx_pool {
 	struct ibmvnic_long_term_buff long_term_buff;
 	int num_buffers;
 	int buf_size;
-};
+} ____cacheline_aligned;
 
 struct ibmvnic_rx_buff {
 	struct sk_buff *skb;
@@ -929,7 +929,7 @@ struct ibmvnic_rx_pool {
 	int next_alloc;
 	int active;
 	struct ibmvnic_long_term_buff long_term_buff;
-};
+} ____cacheline_aligned;
 
 struct ibmvnic_vpd {
 	unsigned char *buff;
@@ -1014,8 +1014,8 @@ struct ibmvnic_adapter {
 	atomic_t running_cap_crqs;
 	bool wait_capability;
 
-	struct ibmvnic_sub_crq_queue **tx_scrq;
-	struct ibmvnic_sub_crq_queue **rx_scrq;
+	struct ibmvnic_sub_crq_queue **tx_scrq ____cacheline_aligned;
+	struct ibmvnic_sub_crq_queue **rx_scrq ____cacheline_aligned;
 
 	/* rx structs */
 	struct napi_struct *napi;
-- 
2.26.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-11-12 19:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-12 19:09 [PATCH net-next 00/12] ibmvnic: Performance improvements and other updates Thomas Falcon
2020-11-12 19:09 ` [PATCH net-next 01/12] ibmvnic: Ensure that subCRQ entry reads are ordered Thomas Falcon
2020-11-13  5:45   ` drt
2020-11-13 16:14   ` Brian King
2020-11-14 23:35   ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-11-16 18:28     ` Thomas Falcon
2020-11-16 18:30       ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-11-12 19:09 ` [PATCH net-next 02/12] ibmvnic: Introduce indirect subordinate Command Response Queue buffer Thomas Falcon
2020-11-13 16:17   ` Brian King
2020-11-14 23:35   ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-11-16 18:18     ` Thomas Falcon
2020-11-12 19:09 ` [PATCH net-next 03/12] ibmvnic: Introduce batched RX buffer descriptor transmission Thomas Falcon
2020-11-12 19:09 ` [PATCH net-next 04/12] ibmvnic: Introduce xmit_more support using batched subCRQ hcalls Thomas Falcon
2020-11-14 23:46   ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-11-16 18:40     ` Thomas Falcon
2020-11-12 19:10 ` [PATCH net-next 05/12] ibmvnic: Fix TX completion error handling Thomas Falcon
2020-11-12 19:10 ` [PATCH net-next 06/12] ibmvnic: Clean up TX code and TX buffer data structure Thomas Falcon
2020-11-12 19:10 ` [PATCH net-next 07/12] ibmvnic: Clean up TX error handling and statistics tracking Thomas Falcon
2020-11-12 19:10 ` [PATCH net-next 08/12] ibmvnic: Remove send_subcrq function Thomas Falcon
2020-11-12 19:10 ` Thomas Falcon [this message]
2020-11-12 19:10 ` [PATCH net-next 10/12] ibmvnic: Correctly re-enable interrupts in NAPI polling routine Thomas Falcon
2020-11-12 19:10 ` [PATCH net-next 11/12] ibmvnic: Use netdev_alloc_skb instead of alloc_skb to replenish RX buffers Thomas Falcon
2020-11-12 19:10 ` [PATCH net-next 12/12] ibmvnic: Do not replenish RX buffers after every polling loop Thomas Falcon
2020-11-13  5:52   ` drt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1605208207-1896-10-git-send-email-tlfalcon@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=tlfalcon@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=cforno12@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=dnbanerg@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=drt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=ljp@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ricklind@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).