From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DB7BC64E8A for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 09:31:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB2E92080A for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 09:31:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b="HvG0Pmo+" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org CB2E92080A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.vnet.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ClcLd725fzDqJ7 for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 20:31:53 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=none (no SPF record) smtp.mailfrom=linux.vnet.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.vnet.ibm.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=HvG0Pmo+; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ClcGS2y4zzDqD4 for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 20:28:16 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098396.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 0B192QsP174598; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 04:28:08 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id; s=pp1; bh=h+H2j61XnIj4yux4GiKfwYu/VvYViXaqljVXUIzH/6o=; b=HvG0Pmo+qCgsGgCFNB/LXUH9EQhNCljmcCMiNr1ZgxDublBpHhddg8Zegided3jz2sQc 54I0xJ9xCcyvwELssqp7F8gR6VErzAkUWN3uStVG2Q97kIaD3ZqlUdNqJmd4TblEDSHC e8ce4WXmMRdEF4raoYAe/vHjNvrx192sr074MZiEtltAxaIMTWy2gjAPqNChptyPHIOQ /N6iXzotSha0QxyjsYcVpWJlmjM8Iy0y52379UTR4Uf3eIoI27976YmtDZfxSdQ3VcbF P+nT1h+Tz5IMsbckHbzQKlO/KXzYxDsa4SL0ZCL1O1eU0f+CoED2lqiucVlx3mFrzeFX uA== Received: from ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (63.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.99]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 355a79nxyj-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 01 Dec 2020 04:28:07 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 0B19DniC005319; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 09:28:05 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay12.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.197]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 353e682y12-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 01 Dec 2020 09:28:05 +0000 Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.58]) by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 0B19S3dQ56033608 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 1 Dec 2020 09:28:03 GMT Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D3F44C04A; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 09:28:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 349D74C052; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 09:28:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.localdomain.localdomain (unknown [9.79.237.135]) by d06av22.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 1 Dec 2020 09:28:01 +0000 (GMT) From: Athira Rajeev To: mpe@ellerman.id.au Subject: [PATCH] powerpc/perf: Invoke per-CPU variable access with disabled interrupts Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2020 04:28:00 -0500 Message-Id: <1606814880-1720-1-git-send-email-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.3.1 X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.312, 18.0.737 definitions=2020-12-01_01:2020-11-30, 2020-12-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 clxscore=1011 priorityscore=1501 spamscore=0 suspectscore=1 impostorscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 malwarescore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2012010057 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: bigeasy@linutronix.de, maddy@linux.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" The power_pmu_event_init() callback access per-cpu variable (cpu_hw_events) to check for event constraints and Branch Stack (BHRB). Current usage is to disable preemption when accessing the per-cpu variable, but this does not prevent timer callback from interrupting event_init. Fix this by using 'local_irq_save/restore' to make sure the code path is invoked with disabled interrupts. This change is tested in mambo simulator to ensure that, if a timer interrupt comes in during the per-cpu access in event_init, it will be soft masked and replayed later. For testing purpose, introduced a udelay() in power_pmu_event_init() to make sure a timer interrupt arrives while in per-cpu variable access code between local_irq_save/resore. As expected the timer interrupt was replayed later during local_irq_restore called from power_pmu_event_init. This was confirmed by adding breakpoint in mambo and checking the backtrace when timer_interrupt was hit. Reported-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev --- arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c | 10 ++++++---- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c index 3c8c6ce..e38648f0 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/core-book3s.c @@ -1909,7 +1909,7 @@ static bool is_event_blacklisted(u64 ev) static int power_pmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event) { u64 ev; - unsigned long flags; + unsigned long flags, irq_flags; struct perf_event *ctrs[MAX_HWEVENTS]; u64 events[MAX_HWEVENTS]; unsigned int cflags[MAX_HWEVENTS]; @@ -2017,7 +2017,9 @@ static int power_pmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event) if (check_excludes(ctrs, cflags, n, 1)) return -EINVAL; - cpuhw = &get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events); + local_irq_save(irq_flags); + cpuhw = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events); + err = power_check_constraints(cpuhw, events, cflags, n + 1); if (has_branch_stack(event)) { @@ -2028,13 +2030,13 @@ static int power_pmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event) event->attr.branch_sample_type); if (bhrb_filter == -1) { - put_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events); + local_irq_restore(irq_flags); return -EOPNOTSUPP; } cpuhw->bhrb_filter = bhrb_filter; } - put_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events); + local_irq_restore(irq_flags); if (err) return -EINVAL; -- 1.8.3.1