Re: [PATCH v5 05/22] powerpc/irq: Add helper to set regs->softe

[Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>]

Excerpts from Christophe Leroy's message of February 9, 2021 3:57 pm:
> 
> 
> Le 09/02/2021 à 02:11, Nicholas Piggin a écrit :
>> Excerpts from Christophe Leroy's message of February 9, 2021 1:10 am:
>>> regs->softe doesn't exist on PPC32.
>>>
>>> Add irq_soft_mask_regs_set_state() helper to set regs->softe.
>>> This helper will void on PPC32.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
>>> ---
>>>   arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h | 11 +++++++++--
>>>   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h
>>> index 614957f74cee..ed0c3b049dfd 100644
>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h
>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h
>>> @@ -38,6 +38,8 @@
>>>   #define PACA_IRQ_MUST_HARD_MASK	(PACA_IRQ_EE)
>>>   #endif
>>>   
>>> +#endif /* CONFIG_PPC64 */
>>> +
>>>   /*
>>>    * flags for paca->irq_soft_mask
>>>    */
>>> @@ -46,8 +48,6 @@
>>>   #define IRQS_PMI_DISABLED	2
>>>   #define IRQS_ALL_DISABLED	(IRQS_DISABLED | IRQS_PMI_DISABLED)
>>>   
>>> -#endif /* CONFIG_PPC64 */
>>> -
>>>   #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>>>   
>>>   #ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
>>> @@ -287,6 +287,10 @@ extern void irq_set_pending_from_srr1(unsigned long srr1);
>>>   
>>>   extern void force_external_irq_replay(void);
>>>   
>>> +static inline void irq_soft_mask_regs_set_state(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long val)
>>> +{
>>> +	regs->softe = val;
>>> +}
>>>   #else /* CONFIG_PPC64 */
>>>   
>>>   static inline unsigned long arch_local_save_flags(void)
>>> @@ -355,6 +359,9 @@ static inline bool arch_irq_disabled_regs(struct pt_regs *regs)
>>>   
>>>   static inline void may_hard_irq_enable(void) { }
>>>   
>>> +static inline void irq_soft_mask_regs_set_state(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long val)
>>> +{
>>> +}
>>>   #endif /* CONFIG_PPC64 */
>>>   
>>>   #define ARCH_IRQ_INIT_FLAGS	IRQ_NOREQUEST
>> 
>> What I don't like about this where you use it is it kind of pollutes
>> the ppc32 path with this function which is not valid to use.
>> 
>> I would prefer if you had this purely so it could compile with:
>> 
>>    if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC64)))
>>        irq_soft_mask_regs_set_state(regs, blah);
>> 
>> And then you could make the ppc32 cause a link error if it did not
>> get eliminated at compile time (e.g., call an undefined function).
>> 
>> You could do the same with the kuap_ functions to change some ifdefs
>> to IS_ENABLED.
>> 
>> That's just my preference but if you prefer this way I guess that's
>> okay.
> 
> I see you didn't change your mind since last April :)
> 
> I'll see what I can do.

If you have more patches in the works and will do some cleanup passes I 
don't mind so much.

Thanks,
Nick