linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	msuchanek@suse.de, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 17/22] powerpc/syscall: Do not check unsupported scv vector on PPC32
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2021 17:56:38 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1612857042.f9qpgkdvz6.astroid@bobo.none> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <82c4abb1-cb52-e856-b2dd-d7c7d48bd292@csgroup.eu>

Excerpts from Christophe Leroy's message of February 9, 2021 4:13 pm:
> 
> 
> Le 09/02/2021 à 03:00, Nicholas Piggin a écrit :
>> Excerpts from Christophe Leroy's message of February 9, 2021 1:10 am:
>>> Only PPC64 has scv. No need to check the 0x7ff0 trap on PPC32.
>>> For that, add a helper trap_is_unsupported_scv() similar to
>>> trap_is_scv().
>>>
>>> And ignore the scv parameter in syscall_exit_prepare (Save 14 cycles
>>> 346 => 332 cycles)
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
>>> ---
>>> v5: Added a helper trap_is_unsupported_scv()
>>> ---
>>>   arch/powerpc/include/asm/ptrace.h | 5 +++++
>>>   arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_32.S    | 1 -
>>>   arch/powerpc/kernel/interrupt.c   | 7 +++++--
>>>   3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ptrace.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ptrace.h
>>> index 58f9dc060a7b..2c842b11a924 100644
>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ptrace.h
>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ptrace.h
>>> @@ -229,6 +229,11 @@ static inline bool trap_is_scv(struct pt_regs *regs)
>>>   	return (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64) && TRAP(regs) == 0x3000);
>>>   }
>>>   
>>> +static inline bool trap_is_unsupported_scv(struct pt_regs *regs)
>>> +{
>>> +	return (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64) && TRAP(regs) == 0x7ff0);
>>> +}
>> 
>> This change is good.
>> 
>>> +
>>>   static inline bool trap_is_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs)
>>>   {
>>>   	return (trap_is_scv(regs) || TRAP(regs) == 0xc00);
>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_32.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_32.S
>>> index cffe58e63356..7c824e8928d0 100644
>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_32.S
>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_32.S
>>> @@ -344,7 +344,6 @@ transfer_to_syscall:
>>>   
>>>   ret_from_syscall:
>>>   	addi    r4,r1,STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD
>>> -	li	r5,0
>>>   	bl	syscall_exit_prepare
>> 
>> For this one, I think it would be nice to do the "right" thing and make
>> the function prototypes different on !64S. They could then declare a
>> local const bool scv = 0.
>> 
>> We could have syscall_exit_prepare and syscall_exit_prepare_maybe_scv
>> or something like that, 64s can use the latter one and the former can be
>> a wrapper that passes constant 0 for scv. Then we don't have different
>> prototypes for the same function, but you just have to make the 32-bit
>> version static inline and the 64-bit version exported to asm.
> 
> You can't call a static inline function from ASM, I don't understand you.

I mean

#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64
notrace unsigned long syscall_exit_prepare_scv(unsigned long r3,
                                           struct pt_regs *regs,
                                           long scv)
#else
static inline long syscall_exit_prepare_scv(unsigned long r3,
                                           struct pt_regs *regs,
                                           long scv)
#endif

#ifndef CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64
notrace unsigned long syscall_exit_prepare(unsigned long r3,
                                           struct pt_regs *regs)
{
	return syscall_exit_prepare_scv(r3, regs, 0);
}
#endif


> 
> What is wrong for you really here ? Is that the fact we leave scv random, or is that the below 
> IS_ENABLED() ?

That scv arg is random. I know generated code essentially would be no 
different and no possibility of tracing, but would just prefer to call 
the C "correctly" if possible.

> I don't mind keeping the 'li r5,0' before calling the function if you find it cleaner, the real 
> performance gain is with setting scv to 0 below for PPC32 (and maybe it should be set to zero for 
> book3e/64 too ?).

Yes 64e would like this optimisation.

Thanks,
Nick

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-09  7:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-08 15:10 [PATCH v5 00/22] powerpc/32: Implement C syscall entry/exit Christophe Leroy
2021-02-08 15:10 ` [PATCH v5 01/22] powerpc/32s: Add missing call to kuep_lock on syscall entry Christophe Leroy
2021-02-08 15:10 ` [PATCH v5 02/22] powerpc/32: Always enable data translation " Christophe Leroy
2021-02-08 15:10 ` [PATCH v5 03/22] powerpc/32: On syscall entry, enable instruction translation at the same time as data Christophe Leroy
2021-02-08 15:10 ` [PATCH v5 04/22] powerpc/32: Reorder instructions to avoid using CTR in syscall entry Christophe Leroy
2021-02-08 15:10 ` [PATCH v5 05/22] powerpc/irq: Add helper to set regs->softe Christophe Leroy
2021-02-09  1:11   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-02-09  5:57     ` Christophe Leroy
2021-02-09  7:47       ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-02-09  6:18     ` Christophe Leroy
2021-02-09  7:49       ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-03-05  8:54         ` Christophe Leroy
2021-03-08  8:47           ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-02-08 15:10 ` [PATCH v5 06/22] powerpc/irq: Rework helpers that manipulate MSR[EE/RI] Christophe Leroy
2021-02-09  1:14   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-02-08 15:10 ` [PATCH v5 07/22] powerpc/irq: Add stub irq_soft_mask_return() for PPC32 Christophe Leroy
2021-02-09  1:19   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-02-08 15:10 ` [PATCH v5 08/22] powerpc/syscall: Rename syscall_64.c into interrupt.c Christophe Leroy
2021-02-09  1:19   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-02-08 15:10 ` [PATCH v5 09/22] powerpc/syscall: Make interrupt.c buildable on PPC32 Christophe Leroy
2021-02-09  1:27   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-02-09  6:02     ` Christophe Leroy
2021-02-09  7:50       ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-02-08 15:10 ` [PATCH v5 10/22] powerpc/syscall: Use is_compat_task() Christophe Leroy
2021-02-09  1:29   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-02-08 15:10 ` [PATCH v5 11/22] powerpc/syscall: Save r3 in regs->orig_r3 Christophe Leroy
2021-02-09  1:29   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-02-08 15:10 ` [PATCH v5 12/22] powerpc/syscall: Change condition to check MSR_RI Christophe Leroy
2021-02-09  1:36   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-02-08 15:10 ` [PATCH v5 13/22] powerpc/32: Always save non volatile GPRs at syscall entry Christophe Leroy
2021-02-08 15:10 ` [PATCH v5 14/22] powerpc/syscall: implement system call entry/exit logic in C for PPC32 Christophe Leroy
2021-02-08 15:10 ` [PATCH v5 15/22] powerpc/32: Remove verification of MSR_PR on syscall in the ASM entry Christophe Leroy
2021-02-08 15:10 ` [PATCH v5 16/22] powerpc/syscall: Avoid stack frame in likely part of system_call_exception() Christophe Leroy
2021-02-09  1:55   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-02-09 16:13     ` Christophe Leroy
2021-02-10  1:56       ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-02-08 15:10 ` [PATCH v5 17/22] powerpc/syscall: Do not check unsupported scv vector on PPC32 Christophe Leroy
2021-02-09  2:00   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-02-09  6:13     ` Christophe Leroy
2021-02-09  7:56       ` Nicholas Piggin [this message]
2021-02-08 15:10 ` [PATCH v5 18/22] powerpc/syscall: Remove FULL_REGS verification in system_call_exception Christophe Leroy
2021-02-09  2:02   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-02-09 14:31     ` Christophe Leroy
2021-02-10  1:57       ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-02-08 15:10 ` [PATCH v5 19/22] powerpc/syscall: Optimise checks in beginning of system_call_exception() Christophe Leroy
2021-02-09  2:06   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-02-09 14:32     ` Christophe Leroy
2021-02-08 15:10 ` [PATCH v5 20/22] powerpc/syscall: Avoid storing 'current' in another pointer Christophe Leroy
2021-02-09  2:36   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-02-09 13:50     ` Segher Boessenkool
2021-02-09 14:31       ` David Laight
2021-02-09 17:03         ` Christophe Leroy
2021-02-09 17:16           ` David Laight
2021-02-10  2:00           ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-02-10  8:45             ` Christophe Leroy
2021-02-08 15:10 ` [PATCH v5 21/22] powerpc/32: Remove the counter in global_dbcr0 Christophe Leroy
2021-02-08 15:10 ` [PATCH v5 22/22] powerpc/32: Handle bookE debugging in C in syscall entry/exit Christophe Leroy
2021-02-09  1:03 ` [PATCH v5 00/22] powerpc/32: Implement C " Nicholas Piggin
2021-02-12  0:19 ` Michael Ellerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1612857042.f9qpgkdvz6.astroid@bobo.none \
    --to=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=msuchanek@suse.de \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).