linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	msuchanek@suse.de, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 18/22] powerpc/syscall: Remove FULL_REGS verification in system_call_exception
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 11:57:40 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1612922197.2b51jxzeqs.astroid@bobo.none> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cc1a35a4-07c3-9e64-18d6-57e497f56e33@csgroup.eu>

Excerpts from Christophe Leroy's message of February 10, 2021 12:31 am:
> 
> 
> Le 09/02/2021 à 03:02, Nicholas Piggin a écrit :
>> Excerpts from Christophe Leroy's message of February 9, 2021 1:10 am:
>>> For book3s/64, FULL_REGS() is 'true' at all time, so the test voids.
>>> For others, non volatile registers are saved inconditionally.
>>>
>>> So the verification is pointless.
>>>
>>> Should one fail to do it, it would anyway be caught by the
>>> CHECK_FULL_REGS() in copy_thread() as we have removed the
>>> special versions ppc_fork() and friends.
>>>
>>> null_syscall benchmark reduction 4 cycles (332 => 328 cycles)
>> 
>> I wonder if we rather make a CONFIG option for a bunch of these simpler
>> debug checks here (and also in interrupt exit, wrappers, etc) rather
>> than remove them entirely.
> 
> We can drop this patch if you prefer. Anyway, like book3s/64, once ppc32 also do interrupt 
> entry/exit in C, FULL_REGS() will already return true.

Sure let's do that.

Thanks,
Nick


  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-10  2:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-08 15:10 [PATCH v5 00/22] powerpc/32: Implement C syscall entry/exit Christophe Leroy
2021-02-08 15:10 ` [PATCH v5 01/22] powerpc/32s: Add missing call to kuep_lock on syscall entry Christophe Leroy
2021-02-08 15:10 ` [PATCH v5 02/22] powerpc/32: Always enable data translation " Christophe Leroy
2021-02-08 15:10 ` [PATCH v5 03/22] powerpc/32: On syscall entry, enable instruction translation at the same time as data Christophe Leroy
2021-02-08 15:10 ` [PATCH v5 04/22] powerpc/32: Reorder instructions to avoid using CTR in syscall entry Christophe Leroy
2021-02-08 15:10 ` [PATCH v5 05/22] powerpc/irq: Add helper to set regs->softe Christophe Leroy
2021-02-09  1:11   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-02-09  5:57     ` Christophe Leroy
2021-02-09  7:47       ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-02-09  6:18     ` Christophe Leroy
2021-02-09  7:49       ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-03-05  8:54         ` Christophe Leroy
2021-03-08  8:47           ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-02-08 15:10 ` [PATCH v5 06/22] powerpc/irq: Rework helpers that manipulate MSR[EE/RI] Christophe Leroy
2021-02-09  1:14   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-02-08 15:10 ` [PATCH v5 07/22] powerpc/irq: Add stub irq_soft_mask_return() for PPC32 Christophe Leroy
2021-02-09  1:19   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-02-08 15:10 ` [PATCH v5 08/22] powerpc/syscall: Rename syscall_64.c into interrupt.c Christophe Leroy
2021-02-09  1:19   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-02-08 15:10 ` [PATCH v5 09/22] powerpc/syscall: Make interrupt.c buildable on PPC32 Christophe Leroy
2021-02-09  1:27   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-02-09  6:02     ` Christophe Leroy
2021-02-09  7:50       ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-02-08 15:10 ` [PATCH v5 10/22] powerpc/syscall: Use is_compat_task() Christophe Leroy
2021-02-09  1:29   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-02-08 15:10 ` [PATCH v5 11/22] powerpc/syscall: Save r3 in regs->orig_r3 Christophe Leroy
2021-02-09  1:29   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-02-08 15:10 ` [PATCH v5 12/22] powerpc/syscall: Change condition to check MSR_RI Christophe Leroy
2021-02-09  1:36   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-02-08 15:10 ` [PATCH v5 13/22] powerpc/32: Always save non volatile GPRs at syscall entry Christophe Leroy
2021-02-08 15:10 ` [PATCH v5 14/22] powerpc/syscall: implement system call entry/exit logic in C for PPC32 Christophe Leroy
2021-02-08 15:10 ` [PATCH v5 15/22] powerpc/32: Remove verification of MSR_PR on syscall in the ASM entry Christophe Leroy
2021-02-08 15:10 ` [PATCH v5 16/22] powerpc/syscall: Avoid stack frame in likely part of system_call_exception() Christophe Leroy
2021-02-09  1:55   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-02-09 16:13     ` Christophe Leroy
2021-02-10  1:56       ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-02-08 15:10 ` [PATCH v5 17/22] powerpc/syscall: Do not check unsupported scv vector on PPC32 Christophe Leroy
2021-02-09  2:00   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-02-09  6:13     ` Christophe Leroy
2021-02-09  7:56       ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-02-08 15:10 ` [PATCH v5 18/22] powerpc/syscall: Remove FULL_REGS verification in system_call_exception Christophe Leroy
2021-02-09  2:02   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-02-09 14:31     ` Christophe Leroy
2021-02-10  1:57       ` Nicholas Piggin [this message]
2021-02-08 15:10 ` [PATCH v5 19/22] powerpc/syscall: Optimise checks in beginning of system_call_exception() Christophe Leroy
2021-02-09  2:06   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-02-09 14:32     ` Christophe Leroy
2021-02-08 15:10 ` [PATCH v5 20/22] powerpc/syscall: Avoid storing 'current' in another pointer Christophe Leroy
2021-02-09  2:36   ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-02-09 13:50     ` Segher Boessenkool
2021-02-09 14:31       ` David Laight
2021-02-09 17:03         ` Christophe Leroy
2021-02-09 17:16           ` David Laight
2021-02-10  2:00           ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-02-10  8:45             ` Christophe Leroy
2021-02-08 15:10 ` [PATCH v5 21/22] powerpc/32: Remove the counter in global_dbcr0 Christophe Leroy
2021-02-08 15:10 ` [PATCH v5 22/22] powerpc/32: Handle bookE debugging in C in syscall entry/exit Christophe Leroy
2021-02-09  1:03 ` [PATCH v5 00/22] powerpc/32: Implement C " Nicholas Piggin
2021-02-12  0:19 ` Michael Ellerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1612922197.2b51jxzeqs.astroid@bobo.none \
    --to=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=msuchanek@suse.de \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).