From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDDFDC433DB for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 21:06:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B215264DE0 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 21:06:01 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B215264DE0 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=gimpelevich.san-francisco.ca.us Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Dfc8S1WqZz3cGF for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 08:06:00 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gimpelevich-san-francisco-ca-us.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@gimpelevich-san-francisco-ca-us.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20150623 header.b=rlpr9Y17; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=permerror (SPF Permanent Error: Void lookup limit of 2 exceeded) smtp.mailfrom=gimpelevich.san-francisco.ca.us (client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::431; helo=mail-pf1-x431.google.com; envelope-from=daniel@gimpelevich.san-francisco.ca.us; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gimpelevich-san-francisco-ca-us.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@gimpelevich-san-francisco-ca-us.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20150623 header.b=rlpr9Y17; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-pf1-x431.google.com (mail-pf1-x431.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::431]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DfZ4J30CLz30Ky for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 06:32:11 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x431.google.com with SMTP id k13so4726314pfh.13 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 11:32:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gimpelevich-san-francisco-ca-us.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=L3nj9/R/NkkK99k6HujqpUsnIKZSJ7ODAWop9jG8uEo=; b=rlpr9Y17GqcS3VcCW+l+bS1nW3xiXbddJLqCQV49EqcSpGV+KSbl8a+FrYFs9PvSYs it8iWSpJw1gsM6AGOhmH5Acw2KmSdULF0CtLUbpv1I2R6STtXs02IIl8hkKiuQrTcClp gnpNivl1Mi0M80qg3y9K82mqykBBymTRSXTNI+7NyuKpk2tirw6/VycnssOaap/hbbRM aoyntdpV8PSwl9fmqwLS6X81BO88m0k21D/riSbB2g+a2Jud+lXOz+nB4Ew3UND3WIr2 OpusKjkcH5p5Sf2vfYR7Obk5HSn1xhQe1A1Xn5XMmt5nQ6eZnXSjlWHxq4HTxliPGZwx aMBw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=L3nj9/R/NkkK99k6HujqpUsnIKZSJ7ODAWop9jG8uEo=; b=S98GH7deIxISfuPKMpl76BwDA3kQLVrr18Vh7RjV4B6YPdblrKIkE37oAr731KW5QP CRGCZWNnsOLO2ewpjJ8azcXydni7T7O7csCQCXJzUeyEKL32xu0ufw18aGCgkIKfXvGw 8VQRBimj5h9meufjeIWHV11bmGj2p+yGRas0+JXv+PgyAefDE63cNj5zVmKxKTMH2Z/0 oo1JQuZzd1K8r/r8sGtCaPUMWOMtBNsST+22XU+IsEWMTBHd9LKrjNUVT7FgWdn7Zzgy m/UyuCBMickxE4UgNB0b6xhggEAvmUl1n1bKB/xuIiMaxei0CRcdQpfviQOtxIbXqBFJ Hk+g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531iHwf452niZu0gozaAaDpIZFWA+Kr3biNWYX/tQ7feLCxMpWrf tsuSbGkuF7+P4Fc4/1ZPME+0xQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwYGpgEV2/GV9/dgnc2/rEWjl2dK3GYAnKQrXXgndNQF0w/cYvidbBIhC5ZupXR2KlChWCpFA== X-Received: by 2002:a63:181e:: with SMTP id y30mr15574858pgl.324.1613417527139; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 11:32:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.72.184] (157-131-244-194.fiber.dynamic.sonic.net. [157.131.244.194]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y1sm196040pjt.37.2021.02.15.11.32.05 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 15 Feb 2021 11:32:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1613417521.3853.5.camel@chimera> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] add generic builtin command line From: Daniel Gimpelevich To: Andrew Morton Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 11:32:01 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20190321151519.1f4479d92228c8a8738e02cf@linux-foundation.org> References: <20190319232448.45964-2-danielwa@cisco.com> <20190320155319.2cd3c0f73ef3cdefb65d5d1e@linux-foundation.org> <20190320232328.3bijcxek2yg43a25@zorba> <20190320201433.6c5c4782f4432d280c0e8361@linux-foundation.org> <20190321151308.yt6uc3mxgppm5zko@zorba> <20190321151519.1f4479d92228c8a8738e02cf@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4-0ubuntu2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 08:05:33 +1100 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Christophe Leroy , Maksym Kokhan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , Paul Mackerras , xe-linux-external@cisco.com, Daniel Walker , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Daniel Walker Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Thu, 2019-03-21 at 15:15 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 21 Mar 2019 08:13:08 -0700 Daniel Walker wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 08:14:33PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > The patches (or some version of them) are already in linux-next, > > > which messes me up. I'll disable them for now. > > > > Those are from my tree, but I remove them when you picked up the series. The > > next linux-next should not have them. > > Yup, thanks, all looks good now. This patchset is currently neither in mainline nor in -next. May I ask what happened to it? Thanks.