From: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] powerpc/pseries: warn if recursing into the hcall tracing code
Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 15:55:42 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1620123377.d2jb7v70z0.naveen@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1619832142.gw4mrldjdp.astroid@bobo.none>
Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> Excerpts from Naveen N. Rao's message of April 27, 2021 11:59 pm:
>> Nicholas Piggin wrote:
>>> + *
>>> + * H_CONFER from spin locks must be treated separately though and use _notrace
>>> + * plpar_hcall variants, see yield_to_preempted().
>>> */
>>> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned int, hcall_trace_depth);
>>>
>>> @@ -1843,7 +1846,7 @@ notrace void __trace_hcall_entry(unsigned long opcode, unsigned long *args)
>>>
>>> depth = this_cpu_ptr(&hcall_trace_depth);
>>>
>>> - if (*depth)
>>> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(*depth))
>>> goto out;
>>
>> I don't think this will be helpful. The hcall trace depth tracking is
>> for the tracepoint and I suspect that this warning will be triggered
>> quite easily. Since we have recursion protection, I don't think we
>> should warn here.
>
> What would trigger recursion?
The trace code that this protects: trace_hcall_entry(). The tracing code
itself can end up doing a hcall as we see in the first patch in this
series:
plpar_hcall_norets_trace+0x34/0x8c (unreliable)
__pv_queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x684/0x710
trace_clock_global+0x148/0x150
ring_buffer_lock_reserve+0x12c/0x630
trace_event_buffer_lock_reserve+0x80/0x220
trace_event_buffer_reserve+0x7c/0xd0
trace_event_raw_event_hcall_entry+0x68/0x150
__trace_hcall_entry+0x160/0x180
There is also a comment aroung hcall_trace_depth that mentions this:
/*
* Since the tracing code might execute hcalls we need to guard against
* recursion. One example of this are spinlocks calling H_YIELD on
* shared processor partitions.
*/
Thanks,
Naveen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-04 10:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-23 3:11 [PATCH 0/4] Fix queued spinlocks and a bit more Nicholas Piggin
2021-04-23 3:11 ` [PATCH 1/4] powerpc/pseries: Fix hcall tracing recursion in pv queued spinlocks Nicholas Piggin
2021-04-27 13:43 ` Naveen N. Rao
2021-05-01 1:22 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-05-02 13:48 ` Michael Ellerman
2021-04-23 3:11 ` [PATCH 2/4] powerpc/pseries: Don't trace hcall tracing wrapper Nicholas Piggin
2021-04-27 13:52 ` Naveen N. Rao
2021-04-23 3:11 ` [PATCH 3/4] powerpc/pseries: use notrace hcall variant for H_CEDE idle Nicholas Piggin
2021-04-27 13:53 ` Naveen N. Rao
2021-04-23 3:11 ` [PATCH 4/4] powerpc/pseries: warn if recursing into the hcall tracing code Nicholas Piggin
2021-04-27 13:59 ` Naveen N. Rao
2021-05-01 1:24 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-05-04 10:25 ` Naveen N. Rao [this message]
2021-05-04 10:45 ` Nicholas Piggin
2021-05-04 16:18 ` Naveen N. Rao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1620123377.d2jb7v70z0.naveen@linux.ibm.com \
--to=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).