From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN, FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 170E1C2B9F4 for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 08:58:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 746DF6113E for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 08:58:18 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 746DF6113E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4G8L0B09KCz3c0G for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 18:58:18 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20161025 header.b=mVukyLLV; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com (client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::631; helo=mail-pl1-x631.google.com; envelope-from=npiggin@gmail.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20161025 header.b=mVukyLLV; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-pl1-x631.google.com (mail-pl1-x631.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::631]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4G8Kzd0J5tz3bvg for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 18:57:48 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-pl1-x631.google.com with SMTP id v12so10097418plo.10 for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 01:57:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:subject:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :message-id:content-transfer-encoding; bh=HNevKIrxlPVGEQdCRLTX5YK2dWZlzRumxTolSmIBotY=; b=mVukyLLVXguaQPXelB9Gk8SACercFpcp6X9VdvmRFsB32rSR6ApbqtXRHKw67UuObq ioIs8Kej4wuAl4ChIcCr08wMnYMsMBcVRdetOlVT1b8afKF4MckZiU1pQpoZd4YRzedX 3NcvmaMn92eCbz8tV+0mnCHw3pdy6g3dZx4piWH9PBvdghL3yE+KoMfKqyfqLyWTDs8O otzEL4rAxky05RpEd5fGDLutCnrpY++kvN5Pf01mSA3FV3YpuCsUmXKGlA5AqAFKqdt1 vg9QIbEaAWoM8Wu7KdEUPmPqZ36bWjeeiOdr0gVcvYGcNgnz7SADAdmCKf8qlzNGFdP4 GrLQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:subject:to:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:message-id:content-transfer-encoding; bh=HNevKIrxlPVGEQdCRLTX5YK2dWZlzRumxTolSmIBotY=; b=U2bmtH8VU1402BfvqJwchYD9IeQu2+oiNs72FmwYxQZJohKU2mlxX3HRhysnYUDgIs ndn5OW2S5zqEN/RdKLEE3hFwb1SyKyHxv4tCtNHUtpF3/y9ad7Q7yigucXyUmZuC1Qa0 vYJaBoH+40DD511SqC7lzbd+eqJ/gmrvDDHIaK7D237oAe4hq/FiYbZRmzaIbfBpMIYI /HaALXR6+FDxjFtL7guHebAArbUNdbSHm/G31atq7cPYnz0mmjYLMbycso83dSVB4teB lsAdWG7pWb+u+u660l4ey8bhi6lO8HSLxQFRN+hJ1RzvLlz0dkcXd/52WqmUu6crjSe/ yRrw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5328lwtXt9vzf8rhtAZJzNyLEirsDRRqW3aiE0Wk8DtRDSJIUTOY mpY9pv5jvV7k9+yTxxv/BseLQ8P4Cgw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyJwExst2s08JaWvoFk8cDPoMa9LLjDx3IKUeSrohb2NQpnydI+1m+kxqw3yA64dmOaKml5Kg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:2282:: with SMTP id kx2mr2673071pjb.60.1624352265702; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 01:57:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (60-242-147-73.tpgi.com.au. [60.242.147.73]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n5sm15609389pgf.35.2021.06.22.01.57.44 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 22 Jun 2021 01:57:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2021 18:57:39 +1000 From: Nicholas Piggin Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Workaround high stack usage with clang To: Michael Ellerman , Nathan Chancellor , Paul Mackerras References: <20210621182440.990242-1-nathan@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20210621182440.990242-1-nathan@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <1624352117.tss3fnkwt4.astroid@bobo.none> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: kernel test robot , Arnd Bergmann , Nick Desaulniers , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Excerpts from Nathan Chancellor's message of June 22, 2021 4:24 am: > LLVM does not emit optimal byteswap assembly, which results in high > stack usage in kvmhv_enter_nested_guest() due to the inlining of > byteswap_pt_regs(). With LLVM 12.0.0: >=20 > arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_nested.c:289:6: error: stack frame size of > 2512 bytes in function 'kvmhv_enter_nested_guest' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger= -than=3D] > long kvmhv_enter_nested_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > ^ > 1 error generated. >=20 > While this gets fixed in LLVM, mark byteswap_pt_regs() as > noinline_for_stack so that it does not get inlined and break the build > due to -Werror by default in arch/powerpc/. Not inlining saves > approximately 800 bytes with LLVM 12.0.0: >=20 > arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_nested.c:290:6: warning: stack frame size of > 1728 bytes in function 'kvmhv_enter_nested_guest' [-Wframe-larger-than=3D= ] > long kvmhv_enter_nested_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > ^ > 1 warning generated. >=20 > Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1292 > Link: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D49610 > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202104031853.vDT0Qjqj-lkp@intel.com/ > Link: https://gist.github.com/ba710e3703bf45043a31e2806c843ffd > Reported-by: kernel test robot > Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor Seems okay to me. If it was something where performance might be=20 signficiant I guess you could ifdef on CC_IS_CLANG, but for this it shouldn't matter. Acked-by: Nicholas Piggin Thanks, Nick > --- > arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_nested.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >=20 > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_nested.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3= s_hv_nested.c > index 60724f674421..1b3ff0af1264 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_nested.c > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_nested.c > @@ -53,7 +53,8 @@ void kvmhv_save_hv_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct h= v_guest_state *hr) > hr->dawrx1 =3D vcpu->arch.dawrx1; > } > =20 > -static void byteswap_pt_regs(struct pt_regs *regs) > +/* Use noinline_for_stack due to https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id= =3D49610 */ > +static noinline_for_stack void byteswap_pt_regs(struct pt_regs *regs) > { > unsigned long *addr =3D (unsigned long *) regs; > =20 >=20 > base-commit: 4a21192e2796c3338c4b0083b494a84a61311aaf > --=20 > 2.32.0.93.g670b81a890 >=20 >=20