From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD6C4C433F5 for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 01:46:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E0CC610F7 for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 01:46:50 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 3E0CC610F7 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists.ozlabs.org Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Hp9nh4qrBz3c4p for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 12:46:48 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210112 header.b=ipfToaop; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com (client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::629; helo=mail-pl1-x629.google.com; envelope-from=npiggin@gmail.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210112 header.b=ipfToaop; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-pl1-x629.google.com (mail-pl1-x629.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::629]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Hp9mx4sXvz2xSH for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 12:46:08 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by mail-pl1-x629.google.com with SMTP id b11so4748409pld.12 for ; Mon, 08 Nov 2021 17:46:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:subject:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :message-id:content-transfer-encoding; bh=x/kAZvJELqvaaxhMw+HYCsaEmYB0aK/LpXX3JqYDTIA=; b=ipfToaopP6G9E1tD6qx54iPQhJ+1LCTMyQzzB8n54AWTfEmabEf7r+4tf5WFCM04n2 gzCPowu1wBJC3o+n1l1U5Xtl2hPQ5BvfpxxChiyqMcHD8jDDKbFzPpMJb8eqJX5FqKle +9UUqO6q6+IqSbQkQOzHIhATgNvIqt4Gdp0UhZ4qRQWJSTKIoUYlulAjVYHMv42RHtbl FGQbYiksxKQtf92JDAohO+5owXdIwwWckEQTKNsvTvJIa6drWB6sIHOg+w7k2M4028ij QTKW9tWWMG+xoMUvi+16WDLZ7OzjkwdXnHRnUxtDbDZlRu5mB9fe1aI4KvuzWq7JEw5I 0s8A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:subject:to:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:message-id:content-transfer-encoding; bh=x/kAZvJELqvaaxhMw+HYCsaEmYB0aK/LpXX3JqYDTIA=; b=iSkclSrJJzM+GSljOkvRfvQYKOUeqRWMWsTxx04Z9TyHTqMJ4QTUIoL26i8aExxVWX f6tpL5sx/zdLQ3PWDvgCmcjASzUfEw89vcl784k1jTOFtSn0rEKCD4cMbhlxbEBqSqLF ZbVxxs0YkLh5645hXexS57v4fjCOD8HxgACcpvd8wJUO55n3e0oaqiZ2Qeczsem9FSq4 znyTWO6a/gpwS1W1HiUR0JwfXNR/37KAIRCMoFKBgEldTq/J1AbsIjlRXBNHq6PdHOlf /Ag6NaHMmpvfGfqw+3I7RNCups7ewQ4xktwPhxCZxgYrKIRT+aRZSFlayhuAJbPj3G9v 0FvQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533oaAAYD2dB76i/MsDufzGcddjh4xqmN5ZW3K5YLfiE6EGw8YMu ghJJN5Nqjunupk4MaKqJjyA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJztiPTG/XtrqPxiglu9jilDqHAo62mTt1xfDtQQwuhp5KynsOzxd0BeRBh3xUDUTC8SZnRrEQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:4306:: with SMTP id q6mr3066792pjg.202.1636422366684; Mon, 08 Nov 2021 17:46:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (60-241-46-56.tpgi.com.au. [60.241.46.56]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h10sm18023009pfc.104.2021.11.08.17.46.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 08 Nov 2021 17:46:06 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2021 11:46:01 +1000 From: Nicholas Piggin Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/pseries/cpuhp: Use alloc_cpumask_var() in pseries_cpu_hotplug_init() To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , =?iso-8859-1?q?Daniel=0A?= Henrique Barboza , Waiman Long , Michael Ellerman , Nathan Lynch , Paul Mackerras References: <20211108164751.65565-1-longman@redhat.com> <87y25ym96i.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> In-Reply-To: <87y25ym96i.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <1636421918.tc1hk6vx8h.astroid@bobo.none> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: =?iso-8859-1?q?Zhang=0A?= Xiaoxu , =?iso-8859-1?q?Laurent=0A?= Dufour , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Excerpts from Michael Ellerman's message of November 9, 2021 11:04 am: > Waiman Long writes: >> It was found that the following warning message could be printed out whe= n >> booting the kernel on PowerPC systems that support LPAR: >> >> [ 0.129584] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at mm/memblock.c:1451 memblock_all= oc_internal+0x5c/0x104 >> [ 0.129593] Modules linked in: >> [ 0.129598] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.14.0-11.el9.p= pc64le+debug #1 >> [ 0.129605] NIP: c000000002040134 LR: c00000000204011c CTR: c0000000= 020241a8 >> [ 0.129610] REGS: c000000005637760 TRAP: 0700 Not tainted (5.14.0-= 11.el9.ppc64le+debug) >> [ 0.129616] MSR: 8000000002029033 CR: 48= 000222 XER: 00000002 >> [ 0.129635] CFAR: c0000000004d1cf4 IRQMASK: 0 >> [ 0.129635] GPR00: c00000000204011c c000000005637a00 c000000002c94d00= 0000000000000001 >> [ 0.129635] GPR04: 0000000000000080 0000000000000000 0000000000000000= ffffffffffffffff >> [ 0.129635] GPR08: 0000000000000000 0000000000000003 c00000000205ac64= 0000000000080000 >> [ 0.129635] GPR12: 0000000000000000 c0000000049d0000 c000000000013078= 0000000000000000 >> [ 0.129635] GPR16: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000= 0000000000000000 >> [ 0.129635] GPR20: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000= 0000000000000000 >> [ 0.129635] GPR24: c000000002003808 c00000000146f7b8 0000000000000000= 0000000000000100 >> [ 0.129635] GPR28: c000000002d7cf80 0000000000000000 0000000000000008= 0000000000000000 >> [ 0.129710] NIP [c000000002040134] memblock_alloc_internal+0x5c/0x104 >> [ 0.129717] LR [c00000000204011c] memblock_alloc_internal+0x44/0x104 >> [ 0.129723] Call Trace: >> [ 0.129726] [c000000005637a00] [c000000005637a40] 0xc000000005637a40 = (unreliable) >> [ 0.129735] [c000000005637a60] [c0000000020404d8] memblock_alloc_try_= nid+0x94/0xcc >> [ 0.129743] [c000000005637af0] [c00000000205ac64] alloc_bootmem_cpuma= sk_var+0x4c/0x9c >> [ 0.129751] [c000000005637b60] [c0000000020242e0] __machine_initcall_= pseries_pseries_cpu_hotplug_init+0x138/0x1d8 >> [ 0.129760] [c000000005637bf0] [c000000000012404] do_one_initcall+0xa= 4/0x4f0 >> [ 0.129768] [c000000005637cd0] [c000000002005358] do_initcalls+0x140/= 0x18c >> [ 0.129776] [c000000005637d80] [c0000000020055b8] kernel_init_freeabl= e+0x178/0x1d0 >> [ 0.129783] [c000000005637db0] [c0000000000130a0] kernel_init+0x30/0x= 190 >> [ 0.129790] [c000000005637e10] [c00000000000cef4] ret_from_kernel_thr= ead+0x5c/0x64 >> >> The warning is printed in memblock_alloc_internal() because the slab >> has been initialized when the initcalls are being processed. To >> avoid the warning, change alloc_bootmem_cpumask_var() call in >> pseries_cpu_hotplug_init() to alloc_cpumask_var() instead. Also >> change cpumask_or() to cpumask_copy() or we will have to use >> zalloc_cpumask_var(). >> >> Fixes: bd1dd4c5f528 ("powerpc/pseries: Prevent free CPU ids being reused= on another node") >> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long >> --- >> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-cpu.c | 8 ++++---- >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >=20 >=20 > This looks similar to the patch Nick sent recently: >=20 > https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/20211105132923.1582514-1-npiggin@g= mail.com/ Ah, you get CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=3Dy if CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS=3Dy. I was wondering how Waiman found it. Differences between the two patches are error checking - no big deal but=20 we should just do it. And GFP_NOWAIT - is this required here? Thanks, Nick