From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27789C433EF for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2021 10:44:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4J8rJ52wdrz3btR for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2021 21:44:21 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210112 header.b=J3fgveQO; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com (client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::430; helo=mail-pf1-x430.google.com; envelope-from=npiggin@gmail.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210112 header.b=J3fgveQO; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-pf1-x430.google.com (mail-pf1-x430.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::430]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4J8rHL1Ht9z308v for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2021 21:43:41 +1100 (AEDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x430.google.com with SMTP id k26so5022570pfp.10 for ; Thu, 09 Dec 2021 02:43:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:subject:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :message-id:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2Qjk1kLBchBn6nu4RyDNGi/pft6RyBtffqzm5RXD6rQ=; b=J3fgveQOyktHd0Ho6etVh+aiABFsCMbits+i4+iiw3mPGq0uV+cwoX51PQxUyX1m/u guVf+Yy/AALjrRYousf5AWBJOSXjBdfIruQ+12bnfDkQtkrkGptAGDly7UT4e+Qf9/A6 ZG6y06qVmUF8U/9C0WnBuCeYTnrQT0Ll4AxFXzvcHBUGOeALFrwANDwwkk2cSazA8fQT JitIEB2WLroaNlv5sDxN5F3yqb6MnIP+xPFJ28c694sFturpNEL5t5AEuTZTC5UTWqjO PVOfPEZ45ZkQYpmOLCeVh8/99r2cqZObZSVqnFBxaEuoX6PyxaJMyUWwq+JlrGlkQQCe lsag== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:subject:to:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:message-id:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2Qjk1kLBchBn6nu4RyDNGi/pft6RyBtffqzm5RXD6rQ=; b=YH3foRUFnPzfHN2NuyGS6joRSoMUetz9BFaX4yKJ8kq4mbcIhyor9FrpoWm4AWNNPM EUGiNebSK2SkUiFo4tcV4y0lAsPgoH7J+pm6bIGszDZQIH+HrqUxG/DfFzh00XSPuDil Ch0rnE7RAjWja4Yf/d+Ys93r2MLEJ8iuMQYPeNsUFDGF20LG0hDeAMa5ho4RUK77omf9 8dV41G5/sNZeedoBZl7kjZ+X4608iuehRtIGJc2x4+uJU8bl7tY852loVFMxzQjtIw2I ZZjvGumFqlbObc7RO4ZCUoKgtDQ4M8JAGR3PfCu4vjj68CM+0BsZNx7b9S0Bk9tCNd32 +jSA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530RXPHmmaMcb649jVSUKlOZcF2wQdpI3+JBsC/EU/Ul5vPXvMX6 rAOgmA4fSydKndX6F4lF2Fo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwHG5S78XCRdMnXjjsXRAdUoVQkNZBPVctW89B41UUPc1LLj2IYRqJKX0ugAkxryonyH8Gm6Q== X-Received: by 2002:a63:b60e:: with SMTP id j14mr33497418pgf.554.1639046618557; Thu, 09 Dec 2021 02:43:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (203-219-139-206.static.tpgi.com.au. [203.219.139.206]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h8sm5230340pgj.26.2021.12.09.02.43.37 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 09 Dec 2021 02:43:38 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2021 20:43:32 +1000 From: Nicholas Piggin Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/10] powerpc/mm: Convert to default topdown mmap layout To: "alex@ghiti.fr" , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Christophe Leroy , Michael Ellerman , Paul Mackerras References: <1639044621.jeow25j0pr.astroid@bobo.none> <360e2a3e-63c6-3ce2-f481-695ad0ec4880@csgroup.eu> In-Reply-To: <360e2a3e-63c6-3ce2-f481-695ad0ec4880@csgroup.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <1639046542.qkwu4mjtew.astroid@bobo.none> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Excerpts from Christophe Leroy's message of December 9, 2021 8:22 pm: >=20 >=20 > Le 09/12/2021 =C3=A0 11:15, Nicholas Piggin a =C3=A9crit=C2=A0: >> Excerpts from Christophe Leroy's message of December 9, 2021 3:18 am: >>> Select CONFIG_ARCH_WANT_DEFAULT_TOPDOWN_MMAP_LAYOUT and >>> remove arch/powerpc/mm/mmap.c >>> >>> This change provides standard randomisation of mmaps. >>> >>> See commit 8b8addf891de ("x86/mm/32: Enable full randomization on i386 >>> and X86_32") for all the benefits of mmap randomisation. >>=20 >> The justification seems pretty reasonable. >>=20 >>> >>> Comparison between powerpc implementation and the generic one: >>> - mmap_is_legacy() is identical. >>> - arch_mmap_rnd() does exactly the same allthough it's written >>> slightly differently. >>> - MIN_GAP and MAX_GAP are identical. >>> - mmap_base() does the same but uses STACK_RND_MASK which provides >>> the same values as stack_maxrandom_size(). >>> - arch_pick_mmap_layout() is almost identical. The only difference >>> is that it also adds the random factor to mm->mmap_base in legacy mode. >>> >>> That last point is what provides the standard randomisation of mmaps. >>=20 >> Thanks for describing it. Could you add random_factor to mmap_base for >> the legacy path for powerpc as a 2-line change that adds the legacy >> randomisation. And then this bigger patch would be closer to a no-op. >>=20 >=20 > You mean you would like to see the following patch before doing the=20 > convert ? >=20 > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/patch/7dabf1cbde67a346a= 187881d4f0bd17347e0334a.1533732583.git.christophe.leroy@c-s.fr/ Yes. Thanks, Nick