From: "Nguyen Nguyen" <nnguyen@cs.umn.edu>
To: "Ilya Lipovsky" <lipovsky@cs.bu.edu>
Cc: "Benedict, Michael" <MBenedict@twacs.com>, linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: futex priority based wakeup
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 19:14:44 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1656e050709111714g1a84656bvd7823f5fc43345dd@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000001c7f4c7$7a7ab5c0$3a0d10ac@Radstone.Local>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4038 bytes --]
I have seen something similar before. Our fix was to use
pthread_attr_setinheritsched(&attr, PTHREAD_EXPLICIT_SCHED) so child threads
wouldn't inherit attribute from parent. Hope it helps.
On 9/11/07, Ilya Lipovsky <lipovsky@cs.bu.edu> wrote:
>
> Hmm. Just for kicks - inside the important thread could you add:
>
> int curpolicy;
> struct sched_param sp;
> pthread_getschedparam (pthread_self (), &curpolicy, &sp)
> printf("important's policy is %d and priority is %d\n", curpolicy,
> sp.__sched_priority);
>
> before the very first futex syscall and after your "printf("important got
> futex!\n");" line.
>
> Do similar for the unimportant thread, and see if you get anything weird -
> e.g. priorities come out to be the same for threads.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: linuxppc-embedded-bounces+lipovsky=cs.bu.edu@ozlabs.org
> [mailto:linuxppc-embedded-bounces+lipovsky=cs.bu.edu@ozlabs.org] On Behalf
> Of Benedict, Michael
> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 5:41 PM
> To: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
> Subject: RE: futex priority based wakeup
>
> Ilya Lipovsky wrote:
> > Your code looks correct to me, so if the kernel developers
> > did their job
> > correctly, the only potentially weak link is glibc.
> >
>
> Well, either the kernel developers didn't do their job, or I am missing
> something. The following also fails, and it should be bypassing glibc:
>
> #define _XOPEN_SOURCE 600
>
> #include <linux/futex.h>
> #include <sys/time.h>
> #include <asm/atomic.h>
>
> #include <sys/syscall.h>
> #include <unistd.h>
>
> #include <sched.h>
> #include <stdint.h>
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <stdlib.h>
>
> int myfutex = 0;
>
> void *important(void *ign)
> {
> sleep(1);
> printf("important waiting for futex\n");
> fflush(stdout);
> if(syscall(SYS_futex, &myfutex, FUTEX_WAIT, 0, NULL)) {
> perror("futex");
> exit(1);
> } else {
> printf("important got futex!\n");
> fflush(stdout);
> syscall(SYS_futex, &myfutex, FUTEX_WAKE, 1, NULL);
> }
>
> return NULL;
> }
>
>
> void *unimportant(void *ign)
> {
> printf("unimportant waiting for futex\n");
> fflush(stdout);
> if(syscall(SYS_futex, &myfutex, FUTEX_WAIT, 0, NULL)) {
> perror("futex");
> exit(1);
> } else {
> printf("unimportant got futex!\n");
> fflush(stdout);
> syscall(SYS_futex, &myfutex, FUTEX_WAKE, 1, NULL);
> }
>
> return NULL;
> }
>
> int main()
> {
> struct sched_param p;
> pthread_attr_t attr;
> pthread_t i, u;
>
> p.__sched_priority = sched_get_priority_min(SCHED_FIFO);
> if(-1 == p.__sched_priority) {
> perror("sched_get_priority_min");
> return 1;
> }
> pthread_attr_init(&attr);
> pthread_attr_setschedpolicy(&attr, SCHED_FIFO);
> pthread_attr_setschedparam(&attr, &p);
> pthread_create(&u, &attr, unimportant, NULL);
>
> p.__sched_priority = sched_get_priority_max(SCHED_FIFO);
> pthread_attr_setschedparam(&attr, &p);
> pthread_create(&i, &attr, important, NULL);
>
> sleep(5);
> printf("futex FUTEX_WAKE\n");
> fflush(stdout);
> syscall(SYS_futex, &myfutex, FUTEX_WAKE, 1, NULL);
>
> pthread_join(u, NULL);
> pthread_join(i, NULL);
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> Which produces:
> unimportant waiting for futex
> important waiting for futex
> futex FUTEX_WAKE
> unimportant got futex!
> important got futex!
>
>
> Could someone with 2.6.22 please verify?
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
> Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
> Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 7379 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-12 0:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-07 15:02 futex priority based wakeup Benedict, Michael
2007-09-07 16:41 ` Ilya Lipovsky
2007-09-07 17:16 ` Ilya Lipovsky
2007-09-07 17:24 ` Benedict, Michael
2007-09-07 17:45 ` Ilya Lipovsky
2007-09-07 17:54 ` Benedict, Michael
2007-09-10 18:51 ` Benedict, Michael
2007-09-10 21:41 ` Benedict, Michael
2007-09-11 22:59 ` Ilya Lipovsky
2007-09-12 0:14 ` Nguyen Nguyen [this message]
2007-09-12 1:09 ` Ilya Lipovsky
2007-09-12 14:56 ` Benedict, Michael
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1656e050709111714g1a84656bvd7823f5fc43345dd@mail.gmail.com \
--to=nnguyen@cs.umn.edu \
--cc=MBenedict@twacs.com \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org \
--cc=lipovsky@cs.bu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).