From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE981DDDFA
	for <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>; Sat, 15 Sep 2007 04:21:25 +1000 (EST)
In-Reply-To: <20070914122510.6dffb747@weaponx.rchland.ibm.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0709131554530.29675@blarg.am.freescale.net>
	<AC7B9A70-5050-4191-A20E-B92686B675D4@kernel.crashing.org>
	<20070914122510.6dffb747@weaponx.rchland.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <16B381A2-66F5-4E7A-BDDC-6E536296C933@kernel.crashing.org>
From: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: Please pull from for-2.6.24
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 13:24:17 -0500
To: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org list" <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List <linuxppc-dev.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-dev-request@ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>

>>> Roy Zang (1):
>>>       [POWERPC] Update mpc7448hpc2 device tree to be compatible for
>>> tsi109 chip
>>
>> Dropped for now.  I doubt we want this based on Segher's comments.
>> (pretty sure its a ts108 on the hpc2 board).
>
> It is a tsi108 on hpc2.  Holly has tsi109.  From a Linux perspective,
> there is no difference.  And the comment Segher made on the list was
> "Looks good, thanks!"  So what other comment are you talking about?

I think that was to the .dts clean ups.  The patch from Roy wasn't  
part of that.

http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2007-September/042499.html

But, I think segher is right in saying we should have tsi109 props if  
the HW is actually tsi108.

- k