From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A756B6F80 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 16:44:24 +1100 (EST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 0/6] flexcan: Add support for powerpc flexcan (freescale p1010) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Kumar Gala In-Reply-To: <1313551944-28603-1-git-send-email-holt@sgi.com> Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 00:44:07 -0500 Message-Id: <16FBAA47-5133-43A1-80CE-C6D63B79FB5D@kernel.crashing.org> References: <1313551944-28603-1-git-send-email-holt@sgi.com> To: Robin Holt Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, U Bhaskar-B22300 , socketcan-core@lists.berlios.de, PPC list , "David S. Miller" List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Aug 16, 2011, at 10:32 PM, Robin Holt wrote: > David, >=20 > The following set of patches have been reviewed by the above parties = and > all comments have been integrated. Although the patches stray from = the > drivers/net/can directory, the diversions are related to changes for > the flexcan driver. >=20 > The patch set is based upon your net-next-2.6 tree's commit 6c37e46. >=20 > Could you please queue these up for the next appropriate push to = Linus' > tree? >=20 > Thanks, > Robin Holt Robin, Do you remember why we went with just 'fsl,p1010-flexcan' as the device = tree compatible? Do we feel the flex can on P1010 isn't the same as on = MPC5xxx? or the ARM SoCs? - k=