From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-ID: <17017.16478.767293.191940@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 07:36:30 +1000 From: Paul Mackerras To: Dan Malek In-Reply-To: <466e699745cf24e660e296530f6e34dc@embeddededge.com> References: <17016.29775.224816.691409@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <466e699745cf24e660e296530f6e34dc@embeddededge.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, trini@kernel.crashing.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Set cpu explicitly in kernel compiles List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Dan Malek writes: > What about cores that aren't CONFIG_6xx (8xx, 4xx, e500, etc.)? Well, what about them? I didn't change anything for them (except to remove the -mstring). What -mcpu or -mtune options do you want for them? > How about we create a CONFIG_GCC_CPUOPT and > CONFIG_AS_OPT, and just get these out of the configuration file? No. We already have enough configuration questions that are unanswerable by ordinary mortals. Paul.