From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from penguin.netx4.com (embeddededge.com [209.113.146.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C504467C54 for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2005 08:36:29 +1000 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20050713214802.68288.qmail@web61016.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20050713214802.68288.qmail@web61016.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v622) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <17068cbdcbb1e2de531d33eb07f768e5@embeddededge.com> From: Dan Malek Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 15:36:13 -0700 To: ming lei Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: double kernel page table entry for the same physical page?! List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Jul 13, 2005, at 2:48 PM, ming lei wrote: > Why linux kernel does such thing and no one consider > it's a problem? Because we don't write software that accesses the memory from both of those locations, unless it is very intentional and necessary. If you are just fishing for ways software _could_ do bad things, there are tons of them. It's our job to write it so it doesn't :-) Thanks. -- Dan